Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence of complications and urinary incontinence following endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in men with a prostate volume of 80 ml and above: results from a multicenter, real-world experience of 2512 patients.
Gauhar, Vineet; Castellani, Daniele; Herrmann, Thomas R W; Gökce, Mehmet Ilker; Fong, Khi Yung; Gadzhiev, Nariman; Malkhasyan, Vigen; Pirola, Giacomo Maria; Naselli, Angelo; Mahajan, Abhay; Maheshwari, Pankaj Nandkishore; Biligere, Sarvajit; Tursunkulov, Azimdjon N; Nasirov, Furkat; Petov, Vladislav; Dellabella, Marco; Lim, Ee Jean; Socarrás, Moisés Rodríguez; Zawadzki, Marek; Cormio, Luigi; Busetto, Gian Maria; Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun; Somani, Bhaskar Kumar; Enikeev, Dmitry; Sofer, Mario; Gómez Sancha, Fernando.
Afiliación
  • Gauhar V; Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Castellani D; Urology Unit, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy. castellanidaniele@gmail.com.
  • Herrmann TRW; Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126, Ancona, Italy. castellanidaniele@gmail.com.
  • Gökce MI; Department of Urology, Kantonspital Frauenfeld, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.
  • Fong KY; Department of Urology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Gadzhiev N; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Malkhasyan V; Department of Urology, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.
  • Pirola GM; Urology Unit, A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russian Federation.
  • Naselli A; Urology Unit, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Multimedica Group, Milan, Italy.
  • Mahajan A; Urology Unit, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Multimedica Group, Milan, Italy.
  • Maheshwari PN; Sai Urology Hospital and Mahatma Gandhi Mission's Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, India.
  • Biligere S; Urology Unit, Fortis Hospital Mulund, Mumbai, India.
  • Tursunkulov AN; Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Nasirov F; Urology Division, AkfaMedline Hospital, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
  • Petov V; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
  • Dellabella M; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
  • Lim EJ; Urology Unit, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
  • Socarrás MR; Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Zawadzki M; Department of Urology and Robotic Surgery, ICUA-Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid, Spain.
  • Cormio L; Urology Unit, St. Anna Hospital, Piaseczno, Poland.
  • Busetto GM; Andrology and Urology Unit, Bonomo Teaching Hospital, Andria, Italy.
  • Teoh JY; Department of Urology, Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
  • Somani BK; Department of Urology, Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
  • Enikeev D; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Sofer M; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Southampton, NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Gómez Sancha F; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 180, 2024 Mar 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507108
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate complications and urinary incontinence (UI) after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) stratified by prostate volume (PV).

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent EEP with different energy sources in 14 centers (January 2019-January 2023). INCLUSION CRITERIA prostate volume ≥ 80 ml. EXCLUSION CRITERIA prostate cancer, previous prostate/urethral surgery, pelvic radiotherapy. PRIMARY

OUTCOME:

complication rate. SECONDARY

OUTCOMES:

incidence of and factors affecting postoperative UI. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 PV = 80-100 ml; Group 2 PV = 101-200 ml; Group 3 PV > 200 ml. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate independent predictors of overall incontinence.

RESULTS:

There were 486 patients in Group 1, 1830 in Group 2, and 196 in Group 3. The most commonly used energy was high-power Holmium laser followed by Thulium fiber laser in all groups. Enucleation, morcellation, and total surgical time were significantly longer in Group 2. There was no significant difference in overall 30-day complications and readmission rates. Incontinence incidence was similar (12.1% in Group 1 vs. 13.2% in Group 2 vs. 11.7% in Group 3, p = 0.72). The rate of stress and mixed incontinence was higher in Group 1. Multivariable regression analysis showed that age (OR 1.019 95% CI 1.003-1.035) was the only factor significantly associated with higher odds of incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS:

PV has no influence on complication and UI rates following EEP. Age is risk factor of postoperative UI.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Incontinencia Urinaria / Resección Transuretral de la Próstata / Terapia por Láser / Láseres de Estado Sólido Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Incontinencia Urinaria / Resección Transuretral de la Próstata / Terapia por Láser / Láseres de Estado Sólido Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article