Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep learning on pre-procedural computed tomography and clinical data predicts outcome following stroke thrombectomy.
Diprose, James P; Diprose, William K; Chien, Tuan-Yow; Wang, Michael T M; McFetridge, Andrew; Tarr, Gregory P; Ghate, Kaustubha; Beharry, James; Hong, JaeBeom; Wu, Teddy; Campbell, Doug; Barber, P Alan.
Afiliación
  • Diprose JP; Independent Computer Scientist, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Diprose WK; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Chien TY; Independent Computer Scientist, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Wang MTM; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • McFetridge A; Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Tarr GP; Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Ghate K; Department of Neurology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Beharry J; Department of Neurology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Hong J; Department of Neurology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Wu T; Department of Neurology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Campbell D; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Barber PA; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand a.barber@auckland.ac.nz.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 2024 Mar 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527795
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Deep learning using clinical and imaging data may improve pre-treatment prognostication in ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

METHODS:

Deep learning models were trained and tested on baseline clinical and imaging (CT head and CT angiography) data to predict 3-month functional outcomes in stroke patients who underwent EVT. Classical machine learning models (logistic regression and random forest classifiers) were constructed to compare their performance with the deep learning models. An external validation dataset was used to validate the models. The MR PREDICTS prognostic tool was tested on the external validation set, and its performance was compared with the deep learning and classical machine learning models.

RESULTS:

A total of 975 patients (550 men; mean±SD age 67.5±15.1 years) were studied with 778 patients in the model development cohort and 197 in the external validation cohort. The deep learning model trained on baseline CT and clinical data, and the logistic regression model (clinical data alone) demonstrated the strongest discriminative abilities for 3-month functional outcome and were comparable (AUC 0.811 vs 0.817, Q=0.82). Both models exhibited superior prognostic performance than the other deep learning (CT head alone, CT head, and CT angiography) and MR PREDICTS models (all Q<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

The discriminative performance of deep learning for predicting functional independence was comparable to logistic regression. Future studies should focus on whether incorporating procedural and post-procedural data significantly improves model performance.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neurointerv Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Neurointerv Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article