Comparison of consistency in acute stroke: Automated ASPECT score software tools and manual consensus scores.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) is a standardized semi-quantitative scoring system. It is widely used to assess the extent of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We evaluated the consistency of three automatic software packages with the overall and region-specific manual ASPECTS scores of AIS patients. METHODS: Retrospectively, we gathered patients who presented with stroke symptoms between February 2019 and June 2022, and 174 cases were eventually included in the trial. Two radiologists reviewed the NCCT images independently; After four weeks, the same two radiologists began randomly reviewing the DWI images, discussed different scores and give consistent results as ground truth. RESULTS: Median ASPECTS of the expert consensus reading was 7 (5-9). Good to excellent correlation of ASPECTS total scores among the three software tools (0.70, 0.74 and 0.83). Correlation among ground truth and Rapid-ASPECTS, RealNow-ASPECTS, ShuKun-ASPECTS (ICC = 0.51, Cronbach's α = 0.53), (ICC = 0.60, Cronbach's α = 0.70) and (ICC = 0.52, Cronbach's α = 0.64) respectively. The AUCs for Rapid, RealNow and ShuKun were 0.61, 0.67, and 0.62 respectively. The region-specific results showed a poor to good correlation. The correlations between the non-dominant and dominant cerebral hemispheres and the ground truth were statistically different (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the scoring consistency between the three automated scoring software and the ground truth is comparable, with RealNow-ASPECTS being no less consistent and effective than Rapid-ASPECTS and ShuKun-ASPECTS, and even better than both. But the consistency grade that still is developable.