Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System in Patients after Kidney Transplantation-First Experience.
Beliancinová, Monika; Kleinová, Patrícia; Blichová, Tímea; Vnucák, Matej; Granák, Karol; Kajová Macháleková, Katarína; Dedinská, Ivana.
Afiliación
  • Beliancinová M; Transplant-Nephrology Department, University Hospital Martin, Kollárova 2, 036 59 Martin, Slovakia.
  • Kleinová P; Department of Internal Medicine I, Jessenius Medical Faculty, Comenius University, 036 59 Martin, Slovakia.
  • Blichová T; Transplant-Nephrology Department, University Hospital Martin, Kollárova 2, 036 59 Martin, Slovakia.
  • Vnucák M; Department of Internal Medicine I, Jessenius Medical Faculty, Comenius University, 036 59 Martin, Slovakia.
  • Granák K; Transplant-Nephrology Department, University Hospital Martin, Kollárova 2, 036 59 Martin, Slovakia.
  • Kajová Macháleková K; Department of Internal Medicine I, Jessenius Medical Faculty, Comenius University, 036 59 Martin, Slovakia.
  • Dedinská I; Transplant-Nephrology Department, University Hospital Martin, Kollárova 2, 036 59 Martin, Slovakia.
Biomedicines ; 12(3)2024 Feb 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38540161
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The diagnosis of graft rejection relies on the identification of donor-specific antibodies along with histological findings. Borderline changes are particularly challenging, representing non-rejection findings in up to 70% of cases. The analysis aimed to compare the results of histopathological conclusions with the findings from examination using a molecular microscope, which assesses gene expression (whole-genome microarray chip technology).

METHODS:

Molecular microscope examination (MMDx) was applied to twelve patients (six men and six women) who underwent either indication or protocol graft biopsy.

RESULTS:

The average age of patients was 46.6 years ± 4.2 (average follow-up from kidney transplantation was 6.1 months ± 1.2). MMDx examination was performed during indication biopsy in 11 patients and protocol biopsy in 1 patient. A total of 33% of the findings matched and 50% did not. Finally, we present a case of a patient with acute cellular rejection findings without clinical and laboratory correlation, where the use of MMDx significantly altered the treatment strategy.

CONCLUSIONS:

MMDx examination is suitable for complementing patients with ambiguous histological findings and a clinical picture not corresponding to biopsy results. The limitations of MMDx include cost and its inability to evaluate the potential recurrence of the underlying kidney disease in the graft.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Biomedicines Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Biomedicines Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article