Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In Vivo Predictive Dissolution and Biopharmaceutic-Based In Silico Model to Explain Bioequivalence Results of Valsartan, a Biopharmaceutics Classification System Class IV Drug.
Gonzalez-Alvarez, Isabel; Ruiz-Picazo, Alejandro; Selles-Talavera, Ruben; Figueroa-Campos, Andres; Merino, Virginia; Bermejo, Marival; Gonzalez-Alvarez, Marta.
Afiliación
  • Gonzalez-Alvarez I; Department Engineering Pharmacy Section, Miguel Hernandez University, San Juan de Alicante, 03550 Alicante, Spain.
  • Ruiz-Picazo A; Department Engineering Pharmacy Section, Miguel Hernandez University, San Juan de Alicante, 03550 Alicante, Spain.
  • Selles-Talavera R; Department Engineering Pharmacy Section, Miguel Hernandez University, San Juan de Alicante, 03550 Alicante, Spain.
  • Figueroa-Campos A; Departamento de Farmacia y Tecnología Farmacéutica y Parasitología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universitat de València, Av. Vicente Andrés Estellés s/n, 46100 Valencia, Spain.
  • Merino V; Departamento de Farmacia y Tecnología Farmacéutica y Parasitología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universitat de València, Av. Vicente Andrés Estellés s/n, 46100 Valencia, Spain.
  • Bermejo M; Instituto Interuniversitario de Investigación de Reconocimiento Molecular y Desarrollo Tecnológico (IDM), 46010 Valencia, Spain.
  • Gonzalez-Alvarez M; Department Engineering Pharmacy Section, Miguel Hernandez University, San Juan de Alicante, 03550 Alicante, Spain.
Pharmaceutics ; 16(3)2024 Mar 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38543284
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to predict the in vivo bioequivalence (BE) outcome of valsartan (VALS, BCS class IV) from three oral-fixed combination products with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ, BCS class III) (Co-Diovan® Forte as reference and two generic formulations in development) by conducting in vivo predictive dissolution with a gastrointestinal simulator (GIS) and a physiologically based biopharmaceutic model (PBBM). In the first BE study, the HCTZ failed, but the VALS 90% CI of Cmax and the AUC were within the acceptance limits, while, in the second BE study, the HCTZ 90% CI of Cmax and the AUC were within the acceptance limits, but the VALS failed. As both drugs belong to different BCS classes, their limiting factors for absorption are different. On the other hand, the gastrointestinal variables affected by the formulation excipients have a distinct impact on their in vivo exposures. Dissolution tests of the three products were performed in a GIS, and a PBBM was constructed for VALS by incorporating in the mathematical model of the in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) the gastrointestinal variables affected by the excipients, namely, VALS permeability and GI transit time. VALS permeability in presence of the formulation excipients was characterized using the in situ perfusion method in rats, and the impact of the excipients on the GI transit times was estimated from the HCTZ's in vivo results. The model was able to fit the in vivo BE results with a good prediction error. This study contributes to the field by showing the usefulness of PBBM in establishing in vitro-in vivo relationships incorporating not only dissolution data but also other gastrointestinal critical variables that affect drug exposure in BCS class IV compounds.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pharmaceutics Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pharmaceutics Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article