Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of Vasopressin-Receptor Agonists Versus Norepinephrine in Adults With Perioperative Hypotension: A Systematic Review.
Heybati, Kiyan; Xie, Guozhen; Ellythy, Luqman; Poudel, Keshav; Deng, Jiawen; Zhou, Fangwen; Chelf, Cynthia J; Ripoll, Juan G; Ramakrishna, Harish.
Afiliación
  • Heybati K; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Xie G; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Ellythy L; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Poudel K; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Deng J; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Zhou F; Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Chelf CJ; Mayo Clinic Libraries, Rochester, MN.
  • Ripoll JG; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Ramakrishna H; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: ramakrishna.harish@mayo.edu.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(7): 1577-1586, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580478
ABSTRACT
Consensus statements recommend the use of norepinephrine and/or vasopressin for hypotension in cardiac surgery. However, there is a paucity of data among other surgical subgroups and vasopressin analogs. Therefore, the authors conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare vasopressin-receptor agonists with norepinephrine for hypotension among those undergoing surgery with general anesthesia. This review was registered prospectively (CRD42022316328). Literature searches were conducted by a medical librarian to November 28, 2023, across MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. The authors included RCTs enrolling adults (≥18 years of age) undergoing any surgery under general anesthesia who developed perioperative hypotension and comparing vasopressin receptor agonists with norepinephrine. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB-2). Thirteen (N = 719) RCTs were included, of which 8 (n = 585) enrolled patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Five trials compared norepinephrine with vasopressin, 4 trials with terlipressin, 1 trial with ornipressin, and the other 3 trials used vasopressin as adjuvant therapy. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality. Among patients with vasoplegic shock after cardiac surgery, vasopressin was associated with significantly lower intensive care unit (N = 385; 2 trials; mean 100.8 v 175.2 hours, p < 0.005; median 120 [IQR 96-168] v 144 [96-216] hours, p = 0.007) and hospital lengths of stay, as well as fewer cases of acute kidney injury and atrial fibrillation compared with norepinephrine. One trial also found that terlipressin was associated with a significantly lower incidence of acute kidney injury versus norepinephrine overall. Vasopressin and norepinephrine restored mean arterial blood pressure with no significant differences; however, the use of vasopressin with norepinephrine was associated with significantly higher mean arterial blood pressure versus norepinephrine alone. Further high-quality trials are needed to determine pooled treatment effects, especially among noncardiac surgical patients and those treated with vasopressin analogs.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vasoconstrictores / Norepinefrina / Hipotensión Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vasoconstrictores / Norepinefrina / Hipotensión Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article