Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Eco-toxicological and climate change effects of sludge thermal treatments: Pathways towards zero pollution and negative emissions.
Morales, Marjorie; Arp, Hans Peter H; Castro, Gabriela; Asimakopoulos, Alexandros G; Sørmo, Erlend; Peters, Gregory; Cherubini, Francesco.
Afiliación
  • Morales M; Industrial Ecology Programme (IndEcol), Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, Norway. Electronic address: marjorie.morales@ntnu.no.
  • Arp HPH; Department of Chemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway; Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), 0886 Oslo, Norway.
  • Castro G; Department of Chemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway; Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Institute for Research in Chemical and Biological Analysis (IAQBUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Comp
  • Asimakopoulos AG; Department of Chemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
  • Sørmo E; Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), 0886 Oslo, Norway; Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), 1430 Ås, Norway.
  • Peters G; Division of Environmental Systems Analysis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, SE 412 96, Sweden.
  • Cherubini F; Industrial Ecology Programme (IndEcol), Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, Norway.
J Hazard Mater ; 470: 134242, 2024 May 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626686
ABSTRACT
The high moisture content and the potential presence of hazardous organic compounds (HOCs) and metals (HMs) in sewage sludge (SS) pose technical and regulatory challenges for its circular economy valorisation. Thermal treatments are expected to reduce the volume of SS while producing energy and eliminating HOCs. In this study, we integrate quantitative analysis of SS concentration of 12 HMs and 61 HOCs, including organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) and per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), with life-cycle assessment to estimate removal efficiency of pollutants, climate change mitigation benefits and toxicological effects of existing and alternative SS treatments (involving pyrolysis, incineration, and/or anaerobic digestion). Conventional SS treatment leaves between 24 % and 40 % of OPFRs unabated, while almost no degradation occurs for PFAS. Thermal treatments can degrade more than 93% of target OPFRs and 95 % of target PFAS (with the rest released to effluents). The different treatments affect how HMs are emitted across environmental compartments. Conventional treatments also show higher climate change impacts than thermal treatments. Overall, thermal treatments can effectively reduce the HOCs emitted to the environment while delivering negative emissions (from about -56 to -111 kg CO2-eq per tonne of sludge, when pyrolysis is involved) and producing renewable energy from heat integration and valorization.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Hazard Mater Asunto de la revista: SAUDE AMBIENTAL Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Hazard Mater Asunto de la revista: SAUDE AMBIENTAL Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article