Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative: Statement of Working Principles and Rapid Review of Methods to Define Data Dictionaries for Neurological Conditions.
Bagg, Matthew K; Hicks, Amelia J; Hellewell, Sarah C; Ponsford, Jennie L; Lannin, Natasha A; O'Brien, Terence J; Cameron, Peter A; Cooper, D Jamie; Rushworth, Nick; Gabbe, Belinda J; Fitzgerald, Melinda.
Afiliación
  • Bagg MK; Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Hicks AJ; Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Hellewell SC; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ponsford JL; School of Health Sciences, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Lannin NA; School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • O'Brien TJ; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Cameron PA; Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Cooper DJ; Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Rushworth N; School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Gabbe BJ; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Fitzgerald M; Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Neurotrauma Rep ; 5(1): 424-447, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38660461
ABSTRACT
The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative (AUS-TBI) aims to develop a health informatics approach to collect data predictive of outcomes for persons with moderate-severe TBI across Australia. Central to this approach is a data dictionary; however, no systematic reviews of methods to define and develop data dictionaries exist to-date. This rapid systematic review aimed to identify and characterize methods for designing data dictionaries to collect outcomes or variables in persons with neurological conditions. Database searches were conducted from inception through October 2021. Records were screened in two stages against set criteria to identify methods to define data dictionaries for neurological conditions (International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision 08, 22, and 23). Standardized data were extracted. Processes were checked at each stage by independent review of a random 25% of records. Consensus was reached through discussion where necessary. Thirty-nine initiatives were identified across 29 neurological conditions. No single established or recommended method for defining a data dictionary was identified. Nine initiatives conducted systematic reviews to collate information before implementing a consensus process. Thirty-seven initiatives consulted with end-users. Methods of consultation were "roundtable" discussion (n = 30); with facilitation (n = 16); that was iterative (n = 27); and frequently conducted in-person (n = 27). Researcher stakeholders were involved in all initiatives and clinicians in 25. Importantly, only six initiatives involved persons with lived experience of TBI and four involved carers. Methods for defining data dictionaries were variable and reporting is sparse. Our findings are instructive for AUS-TBI and can be used to further development of methods for defining data dictionaries.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Neurotrauma Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Neurotrauma Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article