Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transurethral En Bloc Resection Versus Standard Resection of Bladder Tumour: A Randomised, Multicentre, Phase 3 Trial.
Yuen-Chun Teoh, Jeremy; Cheng, Cheung-Hing; Tsang, Chiu-Fung; Kai-Man Li, Joseph; Kwun-Chung Cheng, Bryan; Hoi-Chak Chan, Wilson; Kwun-Wai Chan, Wayne; Churk-Fai Li, Trevor; Chiu, Yi; Law, Man-Chung; Lok-Hei Leung, Clarence; Sze-Ho Ho, Brian; Yue-Kit Lee, Chris; Cheong-Kin Chan, Ronald; Shu-Yin Chan, Eddie; Chan, Marco Tsz-Yeung; Hok-Leung Tsu, James; Tam, Ho-Man; Lam, Kin-Man; So, Hing-Shing; Cho, Chak-Lam; Ng, Chi-Man; Chan, Chun-Ki; Liu, Pak-Ling; Wing-Hong Chu, Ringo; Tsui-Lin Ng, Ada; Chu, Sau-Kwan; Yee, Chi-Hang; Yiu, Ming-Kwong; Lo, Ka-Lun; Au, Wing-Hang; Ma, Wai-Kit; Ka-Fung Chiu, Peter; Sze-Wan Kwok, Hilda; Yip, Siu-Ying; Leung, Chi-Ho; Ng, Chi-Fai.
Afiliación
  • Yuen-Chun Teoh J; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong. Electronic address: jeremyteoh@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk.
  • Cheng CH; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Pok Oi Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Tsang CF; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Kai-Man Li J; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Kwun-Chung Cheng B; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tseung Kwan O Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Hoi-Chak Chan W; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tseung Kwan O Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Kwun-Wai Chan W; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Churk-Fai Li T; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Chiu Y; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Law MC; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Caritas Medical Centre, Hong Kong.
  • Lok-Hei Leung C; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Sze-Ho Ho B; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Yue-Kit Lee C; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Pok Oi Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Cheong-Kin Chan R; Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Shu-Yin Chan E; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Chan MT; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Pok Oi Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Hok-Leung Tsu J; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Tam HM; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Lam KM; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tseung Kwan O Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • So HS; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tseung Kwan O Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Cho CL; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Ng CM; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Chan CK; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Liu PL; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Caritas Medical Centre, Hong Kong.
  • Wing-Hong Chu R; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Our Lady of Maryknoll Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Tsui-Lin Ng A; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Chu SK; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Pok Oi Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Yee CH; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Yiu MK; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Lo KL; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Au WH; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Ma WK; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Ka-Fung Chiu P; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Sze-Wan Kwok H; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Yip SY; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Leung CH; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Ng CF; S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong.
Eur Urol ; 2024 Apr 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692956
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Conventionally, standard resection (SR) is performed by resecting the bladder tumour in a piecemeal manner. En bloc resection of the bladder tumour (ERBT) has been proposed as an alternative technique in treating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate whether ERBT could improve the 1-yr recurrence rate of NMIBC, as compared with SR. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS:

A multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial was conducted in Hong Kong. Adults with bladder tumour(s) of ≤3 cm were enrolled from April 2017 to December 2020, and followed up until 1 yr after surgery. INTERVENTION Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ERBT or SR in a 11 ratio. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL

ANALYSIS:

The primary outcome was 1-yr recurrence rate. A modified intention-to-treat analysis on patients with histologically confirmed NMIBC was performed. The main secondary outcomes included detrusor muscle sampling rate, operative time, hospital stay, 30-d complications, any residual or upstaging of disease upon second-look transurethral resection, and 1-yr progression rate. RESULTS AND

LIMITATIONS:

A total of 350 patients underwent randomisation, and 276 patients were histologically confirmed to have NMIBC. At 1 yr, 31 patients in the ERBT group and 46 in the SR group developed recurrence; the Kaplan-Meier estimate of 1-yr recurrence rates were 29% (95% confidence interval, 18-37) in the ERBT group and 38% (95% confidence interval, 28-46) in the SR group (p = 0.007). Upon a subgroup analysis, patients with 1-3 cm tumour, single tumour, Ta disease, or intermediate-risk NMIBC had a significant benefit from ERBT. None of the patients in the ERBT group and three patients in the SR group developed progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer; the Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-yr progression rates were 0% in the ERBT group and 2.6% (95% confidence interval, 0-5.5) in the SR group (p = 0.065). The median operative time was 28 min (interquartile range, 20-45) in the ERBT group and 22 min (interquartile range, 15-30) in the SR group (p < 0.001). All other secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with NMIBC of ≤3 cm, ERBT resulted in a significant reduction in the 1-yr recurrence rate when compared with SR (funded by GRF/ECS, RGC, reference no. 24116518; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02993211). PATIENT

SUMMARY:

Conventionally, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is treated by resecting the bladder tumour in a piecemeal manner. In this study, we found that en bloc resection, that is, removal of the bladder tumour in one piece, could reduce the 1-yr recurrence rate of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article