Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Percutaneous cecostomy: 25-year two institution experience.
James, Charles A; Hogan, Mark J; Seay, Ryan P; James, Luke T; Jensen, Hanna K; Kaukis, Nicholas A; Moore, Mary B; Braswell, Leah E.
Afiliación
  • James CA; Department of Radiology, Arkansas Children's Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Slot 105, 1 Children's Way, Little Rock, 72202, AR, USA. JamesCharlesA@uams.edu.
  • Hogan MJ; Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Seay RP; Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • James LT; Department of Radiology, Arkansas Children's Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Slot 105, 1 Children's Way, Little Rock, 72202, AR, USA.
  • Jensen HK; Department of Radiology, Arkansas Children's Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Slot 105, 1 Children's Way, Little Rock, 72202, AR, USA.
  • Kaukis NA; Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
  • Moore MB; Department of Radiology, Arkansas Children's Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Slot 105, 1 Children's Way, Little Rock, 72202, AR, USA.
  • Braswell LE; Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Pediatr Radiol ; 54(7): 1137-1143, 2024 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693250
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Reports of technical success, adverse events, and long-term outcome of percutaneous cecostomy in children are limited.

OBJECTIVE:

To characterize technical success, 30-day severe adverse events, and long-term outcome of percutaneous cecostomy at two centers. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A retrospective review of hospital course and long-term follow-up (through May 2022) of percutaneous cecostomy tubes placed May 1997 to August 2011 at two children's hospitals was used. Outcomes assessed included technical success (defined as successful tube placement into the colon allowing antegrade colonic enemas), length of stay, 30-day severe adverse events, surgery consults, surgical repair, VP shunt infection, ongoing flushes, tube removal, duration between maintenance tube exchanges, and deaths.

RESULTS:

A total of 215 procedures were performed in 208 patients (90 institution A, 125 institution B). Tubes were placed for neurogenic bowel (72.1%, n = 155) and functional constipation (27.9%, n = 60). Technical success was 98.1% (211/215) and did not differ between centers (p = 0.74). Surgical repair was required for bowel leakage in 5.1% (11/215) and VP shunt infection was managed in 2.1% (2/95). Compared to functional constipation, patients with neurogenic bowel had higher % tube remaining (65.3% [96/147] versus 25.9% [15/58], p < 0.001) and higher ongoing flushes at follow-up (42.2% [62/147] versus 12.1% [7/58], p < 0.001). Tube removal for dissatisfaction occurred in 15.6% [32/205] and did not differ between groups (p = 0.98). Eight deaths due to co-morbidity occurred after a median of 7.4 years (IQR 9.3) of tube access.

CONCLUSION:

Percutaneous cecostomy is technically successful in the vast majority of patients and provided durable access in most. Bowel leakage and VP shunt infection are uncommon, severe adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Cecostomía Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Radiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Cecostomía Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Radiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article