Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Double-blind, randomized, 8-week multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of STW 5-IIversus placebo in functional dyspepsia.
Vinson, Bettina; Fink, Careen; Wargenau, Manfred; Talley, Nicholas J; Holtmann, Gerald.
Afiliación
  • Vinson B; Bayer Consumer Health, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH Darmstadt Germany.
  • Fink C; Bayer Consumer Health, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH Darmstadt Germany.
  • Wargenau M; M.A.R.C.O. GmbH & Co. KG, Institute for Clinical Research and Statistics Düsseldorf Germany.
  • Talley NJ; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia.
  • Holtmann G; University of Queensland and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Princess Alexandra Hospital Woolloongabba Queensland Australia.
JGH Open ; 8(5): e13054, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38699471
ABSTRACT
Background and

Aim:

Herbal products are widely used to treat patients with disorders of gut brain interaction but clinical efficacy and safety data for treatments lasting >4 weeks are widely lacking. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of treatment with the herbal combination product STW 5-II for patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) meeting Rome II criteria. We also conducted a post hoc analysis including patients meeting Rome IV criteria for FD and evaluated the effect of the G-protein beta 3 (GNB3) subunit polymorphism (C825T) on therapeutic response.

Methods:

This multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind study included 272 FD patients meeting Rome II criteria in the intention-to-treat cohort and 266 meeting Rome IV criteria. We used the validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Score (GIS) to assess GI symptoms, defining response rate as the proportion of patients with ≥50% GIS improvement in at least three of four assessments.

Results:

After 8 weeks, the response rate was significantly higher in the STW 5-II group versus placebo (61.2% vs 45.1%, P = 0.008). Mean GIS non-significantly improved with STW 5-II treatment (7.9 ± 4.41 vs 6.7 ± 4.91 with placebo; P = 0.07). In the Rome IV subgroup analysis, STW 5-II yielded a better response rate (P = 0.01) versus placebo and greater postprandial distress symptom improvement (P = 0.04) versus placebo. Safety parameters did not differ between groups, and GNB3 status was not linked with therapeutic response.

Conclusion:

STW 5-II is efficacious, with no observed safety signals at up to 8 weeks of treatment in patients with FD meeting Rome II or IV criteria.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JGH Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JGH Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article