Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec for the treatment of patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Fernandes, Brígida Dias; Krug, Bárbara Corrêa; Rodrigues, Fernanda D'Athayde; Cirilo, Hérica Núbia Cardoso; Borges, Stéfani Sousa; Schwartz, Ida Vanessa D; Probst, Livia Fernandes; Zimmermann, Ivan.
Afiliación
  • Fernandes BD; Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, Unidade de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Krug BC; Instituto Capixaba de Ensino, Pesquisa e Inovação em Saúde (ICEPi), Vitória, ES, Brazil.
  • Rodrigues FD; Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, Unidade de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Cirilo HNC; Secretaria Estadual da Saúde do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Borges SS; Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, Unidade de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Schwartz IVD; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Probst LF; Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, Unidade de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Zimmermann I; Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás/Ebserh, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302860, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713659
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Onasemnogene abeparvovec has been approved for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy 5q type 1 in several countries, which calls for an independent assessment of the evidence regarding efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVE:

Conduct a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec in patients diagnosed with SMA type 1, based on the available evidence.

METHODS:

This article results from searches conducted on databases up to November 2022. Outcomes of interest were global survival and event-free survival, improvement in motor function and treatment-related adverse events. Risk of bias assessment and certainty of evidence were performed for each outcome. Proportional meta-analysis models were performed when applicable.

RESULTS:

Four reports of three open-label, non-comparative clinical trials covering 67 patients were included. Meta-analyses of data available in a 12-month follow-up estimate a global survival of 97.56% (95%CI 92.55 to 99.86, I2 = 0%, n = 67), an event-free survival of 96.5% (95%CI 90.76 to 99.54, I2 = 32%, n = 66) and a CHOP-INTEND score ≥ 40 points proportion of 87.28% (95%CI 69.81 to 97.83, I2 = 69%, n = 67). Proportion of 52.64% (95%CI 27.11 to 77.45, I2 = 78%, n = 67) of treatment-related adverse events was estimated.

CONCLUSION:

The results indicate a potential change in the natural history of type 1 SMA, but the methodological limitations of the studies make the real extent of the technology's long-term benefits uncertain.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión / Atrofias Musculares Espinales de la Infancia Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión / Atrofias Musculares Espinales de la Infancia Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article