Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Coronary Calcium Is Elevated in Patients with Myocardial Infarction without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors.
Anderson, Jeffrey L; Knight, Stacey; Dong, Li; May, Heidi T; Le, Viet T; Bair, Tami L; Knowlton, Kirk U.
Afiliación
  • Anderson JL; Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA.
  • Knight S; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
  • Dong L; Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA.
  • May HT; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
  • Le VT; Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA.
  • Bair TL; Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA.
  • Knowlton KU; Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84107, USA.
J Clin Med ; 13(9)2024 Apr 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731098
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Recent reports have highlighted myocardial infarction (MI) patients without standard modifiable risk factors (SMRF), noting them to be surprisingly common and to have a substantial risk of adverse outcomes. The objective of this study was to address the challenge of identifying at-risk patients without SMRF and providing preventive therapy.

Methods:

Patients presenting between 2001 and 2021 to Intermountain Health catheterization laboratories with a diagnosis of MI were included if they also had a coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan by computed tomography within 2 years. SMRF were defined as a clinical diagnosis or treatment of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, or smoking. The co-primary endpoints in SMRF-less patients were (1) proportion of patients with an elevated (>50%ile) CAC score, and (2) an indication for statin therapy (i.e., CAC ≥ 100 AU or ≥75%ile). The 60-day and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events were determined. A comparison set included MI patients with SMRF.

Results:

We identified 429 MI patients with a concurrent CAC scan, of which 60 had no SMRF. SMRF status did not distinguish most risk factors or interventions. No-SMRF patients had a high CAC prevalence and percentile (82% ≥ 50%ile; median, 80%ile), and 77% met criteria for preventive therapy. As expected, patients with SMRF had high CAC scores and percentiles. Outcomes were more favorable for No-SMRF status and for lower CAC scores.

Conclusions:

Patients without SMRF presenting with an MI have a high prevalence and percentile of CAC. Wider application of CAC scans, including in those without SMRF, is promising as a method to identify an additional at-risk population for MI and to provide primary preventive therapy.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article