Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of group-based pregnancy care and education: a pilot randomised controlled trial in Melbourne, Australia.
Forster, Della A; Matthews, Robyn; Hyde, Rebecca; Fox, Deborah; Dyson, Kaye; Ryan, Trish.
Afiliación
  • Forster DA; Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia. D.Forster@latrobe.edu.au.
  • Matthews R; The Royal Women's Hospital, Locked Bag 300, Cnr Grattan St and Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. D.Forster@latrobe.edu.au.
  • Hyde R; Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
  • Fox D; The Royal Women's Hospital, Locked Bag 300, Cnr Grattan St and Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
  • Dyson K; Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
  • Ryan T; School of Nursing & Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Pilot Feasibility Stud ; 10(1): 81, 2024 May 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769553
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In group-based pregnancy models, antenatal care and childbirth/parenting education are provided in groups of eight to 10 women, usually with two midwives, and six to eight sessions. Current evidence is inconclusive regarding potential benefit or harm. We aimed to explore the feasibility of implementing an adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS:

A two-arm pilot RCT was conducted in a tertiary maternity hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Women were randomly allocated to either the intervention to receive group-based antenatal care and education (group care) or to usual care, which included hospital-based midwife, caseload midwifery, team midwifery, or GP shared care. Participants were English-speaking, primiparous, low risk, and < 24 weeks gestation at booking. DATA COLLECTION feasibility measures throughout pilot, baseline questionnaire at recruitment, clinical outcome data from the medical record, and a telephone-administered questionnaire 6 weeks postpartum. A focus group explored midwives' views.

RESULTS:

Seventy-four women were recruited from May to June 2017 (group care = 40, usual care = 34). Study uptake was 35%. Women allocated to group care rated their overall pregnancy care more highly (88% good/very good vs 77% in usual care). There was no evidence of harm related to group care. Overarching themes from the midwives were that group care helped 'build connections' and 'empower women'. All midwives would work in the model again and believed it should be expanded.

CONCLUSION:

Group care was acceptable to both women and midwives with no evidence of harm. The pilot demonstrated the feasibility of undertaking a large adequately powered RCT, important given the inconclusive evidence on clinical outcomes regarding the model, and its current relatively widespread implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12623000858695.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pilot Feasibility Stud Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pilot Feasibility Stud Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article