Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Belatacept based immunosuppression: What and when to combine?
Schilsky, Juliana; Dvorai, Reut Hod; Yang, Christine; Suo, Liye; Saracino, Giovanna; Shahbazov, Rauf.
Afiliación
  • Schilsky J; Norton College of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Dvorai RH; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Yang C; Department of Pharmacy, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Suo L; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Saracino G; Baylor Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Shahbazov R; Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Albany Medical Center, Albany, USA. Electronic address: raufosh@gmail.com.
Transpl Immunol ; 85: 102050, 2024 May 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38810889
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This study examines the effect of belatacept based salvage regimens on kidney transplant outcomes.

METHODS:

This single-center retrospective study included all adult kidney transplant recipients between 2011 and 2022 who were converted to belatacept salvage therapy during their follow up. eGFR, graft survival, incidence of infections and neoplasia, histology and DSA data were collected through systematic review of the medical record.

RESULTS:

Patients were divided into 3 groups based on salvage regimen Mycophenolate mofetil/belatacept (MMF/Bela) (n = 28), low-dose Calcineurin inhibitors/belatacept (CNI/Bela) (n = 22), and low-dose Calcineurin inhibitors/ Mycophenolate mofetil /belatacept (CNI/MMF/Bela) (n = 13). Patients with antibody-mediated rejection were more likely to receive CNIs in addition to belatacept (low-dose CNI/MMF/Bela 54%, low-dose CNI/Bela 45%, MMF/Bela 3.6%, p < 0.001). DSA decreased in all groups after transition to belatacept by 15.67% (p = 0.15). No difference in Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time was observed between the groups, and eGFR remained stable over the first year after transition to belatacept. The incidence of death and allograft failure was similar between the groups (low- dose CNI/MMF/Bela n = 3, low-dose CNI/Bela n = 7, MMF/Bela n = 4; p = 0.41). Patients in the low-dose CNI/Bela cohort who were transitioned to belatacept within 6 months from transplant showed a decline in eGFR over the first year after transition, while the other treatment cohorts demonstrated stable or slight increase in eGFR.

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study demonstrates comparable transplant outcomes in terms of eGFR, graft survival, incidence of infections and neoplasia, rejection rate and donor specific antibody (DSA) in three belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression regimens supporting the safety and efficacy of these therapeutic options.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Transpl Immunol Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Transpl Immunol Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article