Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Establishment and validation of a novel disulfidptosis-related immune checkpoint gene signature in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Du, Lihuan; Zhang, Nan; Wang, Bohan; Cheng, Wei; Wen, Jiaming.
Afiliación
  • Du L; Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, NO. 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, China. dlh1984@zju.edu.cn.
  • Zhang N; Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, NO. 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
  • Wang B; Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, NO. 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
  • Cheng W; Department of Urology, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Longyou, Longyou, 324400, Quzhou, China.
  • Wen J; Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, NO. 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Discov Oncol ; 15(1): 236, 2024 Jun 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904744
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most prevalent subtype of renal tumors and is associated with a unfavorable prognosis. Disulfidptosis is a recently identified form of cell death mediated by disulfide bonds. Numerous studies have highlighted the significance of immune checkpoint genes (ICGs) in ccRCC. Nevertheless, the involvement of disulfidptosis-related immune checkpoint genes (DRICGs) in ccRCC remains poorly understood.

METHODS:

The mRNA expression profiles and clinicopathological data of ccRCC patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. The associations between disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) and immune checkpoint genes (ICGs) were assessed to identify DRICGs. Cox regression analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis were conducted to construct a risk signature.

RESULTS:

A total of 39 differentially expressed immune-related candidate genes were identified. A prognostic signature was constructed utilizing nine DRICGs (CD276, CD80, CD86, HLA-E, LAG3, PDCD1LG2, PVR, TIGIT, and TNFRSF4) and validated using GEO data. The risk model functioned as an independent prognostic indicator for ccRCC, while the associated nomogram provided a reliable scoring system for ccRCC. Gene set enrichment analysis indicated enrichment of phospholipase D, antigen processing and presentation, and ascorbate and aldarate metabolism-related signaling pathways in the high-risk group. Furthermore, the DRICGs exhibited correlations with the infiltration of various immune cells. It is noteworthy that patients with ccRCC categorized into distinct risk groups based on this model displayed varying sensitivities to potential therapeutic agents.

CONCLUSIONS:

The novel DRICG-based risk signature is a reliable indicator for the prognosis of ccRCC patients. Moreover, it also aids in drug selection and correlates with the tumour immune microenvironment in ccRCC.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Discov Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Discov Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article