Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determining the accuracy and suitability of common analytical techniques for sophorolipid biosurfactants.
Ingham, Benjamin; Sung, Rehana; Kay, Phil; Hollywood, Katherine; Wongsirichot, Phavit; Veitch, Alistair; Winterburn, James.
Afiliación
  • Ingham B; Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
  • Sung R; Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester M1 7DN, UK.
  • Kay P; JMP Statistical Discovery LLC, Wittington House, Henley Road, Medmenham, Marlow SL7 2EB, UK.
  • Hollywood K; Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester M1 7DN, UK.
  • Wongsirichot P; Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
  • Veitch A; Holiferm Ltd, Unit 15, Severnside Trading Estate, Textilose Road, Trafford Park, Stretford, Manchester M17 1WA, UK.
  • Winterburn J; Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38906848
ABSTRACT
To determine the performance of a sophorolipid biosurfactant production process, it is important to have accurate and specific analytical techniques in place. Among the most popular are the anthrone assay, gravimetric quantification (hexaneethyl acetate extraction), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The choice of analytical tool varies depending on cost, availability, and ease of use; however, these techniques have never been compared directly against one another. In this work, 75 fermentation broths with varying product/substrate concentrations were comprehensively tested with the 3 techniques and compared. HPLC-ultraviolet detection (198 nm) was capable of quantifying C181 subterminal hydroxyl diacetylated lactonic sophorolipid down to a lower limit of 0.3 g/L with low variability (<3.21%). Gravimetric quantification of the broths following liquidliquid extraction with hexane and ethyl acetate showed some linearity (R2 = .658) when compared to HPLC but could not quantify lower than 11.06 g/L, even when no sophorolipids were detected in the sample, highlighting the non-specificity of the method to co-extract non-sophorolipid components in the final gravimetric measure. The anthrone assay showed no linearity (R2 = .129) and was found to cross-react with media components (rapeseed oil, corn steep liquor, glucose), leading to consistent overestimation of sophorolipid concentration. The appearance of poor biomass separation during sample preparation with centrifugation was noted and resolved with a novel sample preparation method with pure ethanol. Extensive analysis and comparisons of the most common sophorolipid quantification techniques are explored and the limitations/advantages are highlighted. The findings provide a guide for scientists to make an informed decision on the suitable quantification tool that meets their needs, exploring all aspects of the analysis process from harvest, sample preparation, and analysis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tensoactivos Idioma: En Revista: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol Asunto de la revista: BIOTECNOLOGIA / MICROBIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tensoactivos Idioma: En Revista: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol Asunto de la revista: BIOTECNOLOGIA / MICROBIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article