Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Routine Clinical Breast Examination Is a Low-Yield Practice Among Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer.
Hua, Tien; Mendoza, Sergio; McCririe-Balcom, Morgan; Kelley, Jesse; Wright, G Paul; Thompson, Jessica.
Afiliación
  • Hua T; Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. huatien@msu.edu.
  • Mendoza S; Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
  • McCririe-Balcom M; Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
  • Kelley J; General Surgery Residency, Corewell Health West, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
  • Wright GP; Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
  • Thompson J; Division of Cancer Health, Corewell Health West, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 2024 Jul 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958807
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

For women at increased risk of breast cancer, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend clinical encounters every 6-12 months. While screening mammography has corresponded with a relative risk reduction in breast cancer mortality of approximately 20%, evidence validating clinical breast examination (CBE) as an efficacious screening modality is deficient. Our study aimed to assess the conventional merit of regular CBE for breast cancer detection among individuals at increased risk of breast cancer development.

METHODS:

Women > 18 years with documented high-risk encounters at Corewell Health West from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 22 were retrospectively reviewed. High-risk criteria included genetic predisposition, 5-year (> 1.7%) or lifetime (> 20%) Tyrer-Cuzick and/or Gail Model risk estimations, thoracic radiotherapy before age 30 years, lobular carcinoma in-situ, or atypical hyperplasia. Patients with a history of breast cancer or bilateral prophylactic mastectomy prior to 2018 were excluded.

RESULTS:

Of the 9171 cumulative high-risk encounters among 2493 women, only one breast cancer was detected by CBE. CBE resulted in 1 (0.04%) cancer diagnosis compared with 30 (1.2%) detected on screening imaging and 10 (0.4%) self-reported. Of the 30 image-detected cancers, 28 (93.3%) had no detectable clinical findings at the time of preoperative consultation. Self-reported and CBE-detected cancers were more likely to be of higher clinical stage compared with imaging-detected malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS:

The role of routine CBE as a cancer detection modality in the high-risk patient population appears to be limited. Telemedicine can be offered to individuals who have completed screening imaging but are unable to commit and/or are inconvenienced by in-person high-risk breast cancer assessments.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article