Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Categorising interventions to enhance vaccine uptake or reduce vaccine hesitancy in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kafadar, Aysegul Humeyra; Sabatini, Serena; Jones, Katy A; Dening, Tom.
Afiliación
  • Kafadar AH; Academic Unit of Mental Health and Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: AYSEGUL.KAFADAR@nottingham.ac.uk.
  • Sabatini S; Academic and Research Departments, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, United Kingdom.
  • Jones KA; Academic Unit of Mental Health and Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Dening T; Academic Unit of Mental Health and Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Vaccine ; 2024 Jul 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960789
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Vaccination is one of the most important public health interventions to combat infectious disease. However, vaccine hesitancy prevents us reaching the global target of vaccine uptake (e.g., 75 % of influenza vaccination in at-risk groups). This review summarises all interventions designed to reduce vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccine uptake for all types of vaccines offered to adults (≥18 years) since 2000, in the United Kingdom (UK).

METHODS:

PubMed, Cochrane Reviews, CINAHL EBSCO, and Scopus were searched (September 19, 2023). The PRISMA Checklist 2020 was used for quality checking. Data from randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) were analysed with a meta-analysis and narrative analysis. In all included studies, a narrative synthesis was undertaken to summarise, evaluate and characterisethe reported behaviour change interventions into four categories organisational-level, public demand, provider-level, and multidimensional interventions. Findings are evaluated based on the MINDSPACE framework to understand the possible psychological mechanisms underpinning the interventions.

FINDINGS:

A total of 9,842 articles were identified, 50 met the inclusion criteria. Interventions aimed to boost vaccine uptake or reduce hesitancy of influenza (50 %), COVID-19 (32 %), hepatitis B (6 %), and other vaccines. A meta-analysis was conducted for nine RCTs evaluating various interventions impact on vaccine uptake. The pooled effect was statistically significant (OR with 95 % CI = 1.23 [1.07 to 1.41]). Providing certain and understandableinformation and using a reminder system with personal messages or letters were the most frequently documented and effective interventions to enhance public demand (enhance information salience). Organisational level interventions intended to make vaccinations more accessible (e.g., providing vaccination at alternative places or times). Provider-oriented interventions encouraged healthcare workers to focus on reducing vaccine hesitancy or enhancing vaccine uptake.

INTERPRETATION:

Among the main MINDSPACE techniques, enhancing the salience of vaccine information and priming vaccination by improving access were identified as the most applied and effective interventions in the UK.

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Vaccine Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Vaccine Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article