Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Musculoskeletal Health and Work: Development and Internal-External Cross-Validation of a Model to Predict Risk of Work Absence and Presenteeism in People Seeking Primary Healthcare.
Archer, Lucinda; Peat, George; Snell, Kym I E; Hill, Jonathan C; Dunn, Kate M; Foster, Nadine E; Bishop, Annette; van der Windt, Danielle; Wynne-Jones, Gwenllian.
Afiliación
  • Archer L; School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
  • Peat G; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
  • Snell KIE; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK.
  • Hill JC; School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
  • Dunn KM; Centre for Applied Health and Social Care Research (CARe), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.
  • Foster NE; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
  • Bishop A; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK.
  • van der Windt D; School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
  • Wynne-Jones G; School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
J Occup Rehabil ; 2024 Jul 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963652
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To develop and validate prediction models for the risk of future work absence and level of presenteeism, in adults seeking primary healthcare with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD).

METHODS:

Six studies from the West-Midlands/Northwest regions of England, recruiting adults consulting primary care with MSD were included for model development and internal-external cross-validation (IECV). The primary outcome was any work absence within 6 months of their consultation. Secondary outcomes included 6-month presenteeism and 12-month work absence. Ten candidate predictors were included age; sex; multisite pain; baseline pain score; pain duration; job type; anxiety/depression; comorbidities; absence in the previous 6 months; and baseline presenteeism.

RESULTS:

For the 6-month absence model, 2179 participants (215 absences) were available across five studies. Calibration was promising, although varied across studies, with a pooled calibration slope of 0.93 (95% CI 0.41-1.46) on IECV. On average, the model discriminated well between those with work absence within 6 months, and those without (IECV-pooled C-statistic 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.86). The 6-month presenteeism model, while well calibrated on average, showed some individual-level variation in predictive accuracy, and the 12-month absence model was poorly calibrated due to the small available size for model development.

CONCLUSIONS:

The developed models predict 6-month work absence and presenteeism with reasonable accuracy, on average, in adults consulting with MSD. The model to predict 12-month absence was poorly calibrated and is not yet ready for use in practice. This information may support shared decision-making and targeting occupational health interventions at those with a higher risk of absence or presenteeism in the 6 months following consultation. Further external validation is needed before the models' use can be recommended or their impact on patients can be fully assessed.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Occup Rehabil Asunto de la revista: REABILITACAO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Occup Rehabil Asunto de la revista: REABILITACAO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article