Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of remimazolam tosilate and propofol during induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, single center, randomized controlled trial.
Luo, Zhuxin; Cao, Hai; Luo, Li; Chen, Long; Feng, Dian; Huang, Guihua.
Afiliación
  • Luo Z; The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, (The First People's Hospital of Zunyi), Guizhou, China. lzx206@126.com.
  • Cao H; The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, (The First People's Hospital of Zunyi), Guizhou, China.
  • Luo L; The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, (The First People's Hospital of Zunyi), Guizhou, China.
  • Chen L; The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, (The First People's Hospital of Zunyi), Guizhou, China.
  • Feng D; The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, (The First People's Hospital of Zunyi), Guizhou, China.
  • Huang G; The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, (The First People's Hospital of Zunyi), Guizhou, China.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 226, 2024 Jul 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38971731
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Remimazolam tosilate (RT) is a new, ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine. Here, we investigated the efficacy and safety of RT for general anesthesia in patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS:

In this study, 122 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to receive either remimazolam tosilate (Group RT) or propofol group (Group P). RT was administered as a slow bolus of 0.3 mg kg- 1 for induction, followed by 1.0-2.0 mg kg- 1 h- 1 for maintenance of general anesthesia. Propofol was started at 2 mg kg- 1 and followed by 4-10 mg kg- 1 h- 1 until the end of surgery. The primary outcome was the time to bispectral index (BIS) ≤ 60. The secondary outcome included the time to loss of consciousness (LoC), and the time to extubation. Adverse events were also assessed.

RESULTS:

A total of 112 patients were recruited for study participation. Among them, the time to BIS ≤ 60 in Group RT was longer than that in Group P (Group RT 89.3 ± 10.7 s; Group P 85.9 ± 9.7 s, P > 0.05). While the time to LoC comparing remimazolam and propofol showed no statistical significance (Group RT 74.4 ± 10.3 s; Group P 74.7 ± 9.3 s, P > 0.05). The time to extubation in Group RT was significantly longer than that in Group P (Group RT 16.0 ± 2.6 min; Group P 8.8 ± 4.3 min, P < 0.001). Remimazolam tosilate had more stable hemodynamics and a lower incidence of hypotension during general anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS:

Remimazolam tosilate can be safely and effectively used for general anesthesia in patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. It maintains stable hemodynamics during induction and maintenance of general anesthesia compared with propofol. Further studies are needed to validate the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2300071256 (date of registration 09/05/2023).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Benzodiazepinas / Propofol / Colecistectomía Laparoscópica / Anestésicos Intravenosos / Anestesia General Idioma: En Revista: BMC Anesthesiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Benzodiazepinas / Propofol / Colecistectomía Laparoscópica / Anestésicos Intravenosos / Anestesia General Idioma: En Revista: BMC Anesthesiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article