Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Time to Diagnosis and Treatment for Ovarian Cancer and Associations with Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
Bergin, Rebecca J; O'Sullivan, Deirdre; Dixon-Suen, Suzanne; Emery, Jon D; English, Dallas R; Milne, Roger L; White, Victoria M.
Afiliación
  • Bergin RJ; Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
  • O'Sullivan D; Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Dixon-Suen S; Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Emery JD; Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
  • English DR; School of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
  • Milne RL; Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
  • White VM; Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976232
ABSTRACT

Background:

Ovarian cancer is commonly diagnosed symptomatically at an advanced stage. Better survival for early disease suggests improving diagnostic pathways may increase survival. This study examines literature assessing diagnostic intervals and their association with clinical and psychological outcomes.

Methods:

Medline, EMBASE, and EmCare databases were searched for studies including quantitative measures of at least one interval, published between January 1, 2000 and August 9, 2022. Interval measures and associations (interval, outcomes, analytic strategy) were synthesized. Risk of bias of association studies was assessed using the Aarhus Checklist and ROBINS-E tool.

Results:

In total, 65 papers (20 association studies) were included and 26 unique intervals were identified. Interval estimates varied widely and were impacted by summary statistic used (mean or median) and group focused on. Of Aarhus-defined intervals, patient (symptom to presentation, n = 23; range [median] 7-168 days) and diagnostic (presentation to diagnosis, n = 22; range [median] 7-270 days) were most common. Nineteen association studies examined survival or stage outcomes with most, including five low risk-of-bias studies, finding no association.

Conclusions:

Studies reporting intervals for ovarian cancer diagnosis are limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Greater utilization of the Aarhus statement to define intervals and appropriate analytic methods is needed to strengthen findings from future studies.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / SAUDE DA MULHER Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / SAUDE DA MULHER Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article