Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of Factors Determining Spleen Preservation during Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy - A Cohort Study.
Borys, Maciej; Wysocki, Michal; Galazka, Krystyna; Budzynski, Andrzej.
Afiliación
  • Borys M; Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Cracow, Poland.
  • Wysocki M; Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Cracow, Poland.
  • Galazka K; Department of Pathomorphology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
  • Budzynski A; Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Cracow, Poland.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 34(5): 497-503, 2024 Oct 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028110
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Spleen preservation during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) should be pursued if safe and oncologically justified. The aim of the presented study was to compare surgical outcomes and identify risk factors for unplanned splenectomy during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and evaluate short and long-terms outcomes.

METHODS:

The following study is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, with the intention of preserving the spleen, for benign tumors of the body and tail of the pancreas between August 2012 and December 2022. Follow-up for patients' survival was completed in January 2023. In all, 106 patients were in total included in this study. Median age was 58 (41 to 67) years. The study population included 29 males (27.4%) and 77 females (72.6%).

RESULTS:

Spleen preservation was possible in 67 (63.2%) patients. The tumor size was larger in the splenectomy group (respectively, 30 (16.5 to 49) vs. 15 (11 to 25); P <0.001). Overall, serious postoperative morbidity was 13.4% in the LSPDP group and 20.5% in the second group ( P =0.494). There were no perioperative deaths. The postoperative pancreatic fistula rate was 18% in the splenectomy group and 14.9% in the LSPDP group, while B and C fistulas were diagnosed in 15.4% and 10.5% of patients, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression model, tumor size >3 cm was found to independently increase odds for unplanned splenectomy (OR 8.41, 95%CI 2.89-24.46; standardized for BMI).

CONCLUSION:

Unplanned splenectomy during the attempt of LSPDP does not increase the risk for postoperative morbidity and postoperative pancreatic fistula. The independent risk factor for unplanned splenectomy during LSPDP is tumor size above 3 cm.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pancreatectomía / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Bazo / Esplenectomía / Laparoscopía / Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano Idioma: En Revista: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech / Surg. laparosc. endosc. percutaneous tech / Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pancreatectomía / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Bazo / Esplenectomía / Laparoscopía / Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano Idioma: En Revista: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech / Surg. laparosc. endosc. percutaneous tech / Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article