Shoulder Motion Overestimated by Mallet Scores.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI) occur in up 0.4 to 4.6 per 1000 live births. Weakness about the shoulder and development of glenohumeral joint contractures are common sequalae of BPBI. Shoulder function in children with BPBI is frequently assessed using the modified Mallet classification to evaluate upper extremity motion deficits. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the abduction, external rotation, and hand-to-mouth Mallet classification scores in children with BPBI using motion capture. METHODS: A retrospective study of 107 children with BPBI who underwent motion capture assessment and Mallet scores on the same date were reviewed. Motion capture measurements were used to calculate humerothoracic elevation and external rotation joint angles in the abduction/hand-to-mouth and external rotation positions, respectively. The humerothoracic joint angles were converted to the corresponding Mallet scores. Discrepancies between the Mallet scores determined by clinicians and those determined by motion capture were assessed. RESULTS: For abduction, 24.3% of Mallet scores were misclassified during clinical examination. Of the misclassified scores, 22 were overestimated by 1 point and 4 were underestimated by 1 point compared with motion capture. For external rotation, 72.9% of Mallet scores were misclassified during clinical examination. Only 5 patients had an HT elevation that was less than 40 degrees, with 4 of them (80%) having a Mallet hand-to-mouth score of 4. There were no differences in proportion of patients with HT elevation less than 40 degrees who had a Mallet score of 4 or a Mallet score less than 4. CONCLUSIONS: There was better agreement in global abduction Mallet scores compared with external rotation and hand-to-mouth Mallet scores. This difference was likely due to the complex compensatory strategies that patients employ while performing external rotation and hand-to-mouth positions. The inaccuracy of the clinically determined Mallet scores is alarming given that they are frequently utilized to assist with surgical indications and are commonly used as outcome measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV Case series.