Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Potential healthcare resource use and associated costs of every 2 month injectable cabotegravir plus rilpivirine long-acting regimen implementation in the Spanish National Healthcare System compared to daily oral HIV treatments.
Aparicio, Laura-Amanda Vallejo; García, Victoria Neches; Hernández-Novoa, Beatriz; Casado, Gregorio; Jodar, Ferrán; Pinel, Marco; Velasco, Daniel Callejo.
Afiliación
  • Aparicio LV; GSK, C. de Severo Ochoa, Tres Cantos, Madrid, 28760, España. laura.a.vallejo@gsk.com.
  • García VN; GSK, C. de Severo Ochoa, Tres Cantos, Madrid, 28760, España.
  • Hernández-Novoa B; ViiV Healthcare, Tres Cantos, Madrid, España.
  • Casado G; IQVIA, Madrid, España.
  • Jodar F; IQVIA, Madrid, España.
  • Pinel M; IQVIA, Madrid, España.
  • Velasco DC; IQVIA, Madrid, España.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 775, 2024 Aug 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39095714
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

HIV treatment currently consists of daily oral antiretroviral therapy (ART). Cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting (CAB + RPV LA) is the first ART available in Spain administered every 2 months through intramuscular injection by a healthcare professional (HCP). The objective of this analysis was to assess potential healthcare resource use (HRU) and cost impact of implementing CAB + RPV LA vs. daily oral ART at National Health System (NHS) hospitals.

METHODS:

Online quantitative interviews and cost analysis were performed. Infectious disease specialists (IDS), hospital pharmacists (HP) and nurses were asked about their perception of potential differences in HRU between CAB + RPV LA vs. daily oral ART, among other concepts of interest. Spanish official tariffs were applied as unit costs to the HRU estimates (€2022).

RESULTS:

120 responders (n = 40 IDS, n = 40 HP, n = 40 nurses) estimated an average number of annual visits per patient by speciality (IDS, HP, and nurse, respectively) of 3.3 vs. 3.7; 4.4 vs. 6.2; 6.1 vs. 3.9, for CAB + RPV LA vs. daily oral ART, and 3.0 vs. 3.2; 4.8 vs. 5.8; 6.9 vs. 4.9, respectively when adjusting by corresponding specialist responses. Estimation by the total sample led to an annual total cost per patient of €2,076 vs. €2,473, being €2,032 vs. €2,237 after adjusting by corresponding HCP, for CAB + RPV LA vs. daily oral ART.

CONCLUSIONS:

These results suggest that the implementation of CAB + RPV LA in NHS hospitals would not incur in increased HRU-related costs compared to current daily oral ARTs, being potentially neutral or even cost-saving.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Piridonas / Infecciones por VIH / Fármacos Anti-VIH / Rilpivirina País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis / BMC infect. dis / BMC infectious diseases Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Piridonas / Infecciones por VIH / Fármacos Anti-VIH / Rilpivirina País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis / BMC infect. dis / BMC infectious diseases Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article