Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identifying Patients at Risk for Alcohol-Exposed Pregnancies: The Importance of Addressing Multiple Risk Factors.
McRee, Bonnie G; Hanson, Bridget L; Vendetti, Janice; King, Diane K; Pawlukiewicz, Iwona; Berry, Erin; Johnson, Jessica; Marshall, Deanna; Rosato, Lauren; Steinberg Gallucci, Karen; Whitmore, Corrie.
Afiliación
  • McRee BG; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
  • Hanson BL; Center for Behavioral Health Research and Services, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, USA.
  • Vendetti J; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
  • King DK; Center for Behavioral Health Research and Services, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, USA.
  • Pawlukiewicz I; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
  • Berry E; Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai'i, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Johnson J; Planned Parenthood of Southern New England, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Marshall D; Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai'i, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Rosato L; Planned Parenthood of Southern New England, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Steinberg Gallucci K; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
  • Whitmore C; Center for Behavioral Health Research and Services, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Subst Use Addctn J ; : 29767342241267086, 2024 Aug 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39096200
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The increasing prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders is a critical public health issue. Two behaviors, consuming alcohol and using less effective pregnancy prevention, may result in alcohol-exposed pregnancies (AEPs) in individuals who can become pregnant. In the context of alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) services, cutoff scores on widely used alcohol risk assessments (eg, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, U.S. version [USAUDIT]) may fail to identify individuals whose relatively low alcohol consumption may still put them at risk for an AEP due to their pregnancy prevention method.

METHODS:

To identify this gap in alcohol SBI service delivery, we examined data from 2 reproductive healthcare systems implementing alcohol SBI, to explore the prevalence of individuals who met both of the following risk conditions reported any alcohol use on the USAUDIT and a pregnancy prevention method less than 88% effective. Electronic health records for individuals aged 18 to 49 presenting for preventive care in 2021 were analyzed.

RESULTS:

Of 11 567 screened, 7638 reported some alcohol use, but screened at a lower-risk level and were not flagged to receive an alcohol-focused brief intervention (BI). Of these, 1477 were using a method of pregnancy prevention that was less than 88% effective. In addition, 118 of the 1676 who screened positive on the USAUDIT were using less effective contraception and did not receive a BI. In summary, the number of individuals at risk of an AEP who did not receive an alcohol BI was 1595 (13.8%) of the total patients screened for at-risk alcohol use.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is a need for system modifications to assess multiple behaviors simultaneously and alert providers when a combination of behaviors increases a specific health risk, such as an AEP. Tailored alcohol BIs that include the risks/benefits of various pregnancy prevention methods to reduce AEPs provide opportunities to enhance the reach of standard alcohol SBI services.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Subst Use Addctn J Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Subst Use Addctn J Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article