Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chemical profiling and quality evaluation of raw and vinegar-processing frankincense by multiple UPLC-MS/MS techniques.
Li, Na; Wang, Yuan; Rao, Jinqiu; Ma, Zicheng; Zhang, Bingyang; Dou, Zhiying; Wang, Kai; Qiu, Feng.
Afiliación
  • Li N; School of Chinese Materia Medica, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
  • Wang Y; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Therapeutic Substance of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
  • Rao J; School of Chinese Materia Medica, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
  • Ma Z; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Therapeutic Substance of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
  • Zhang B; State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
  • Dou Z; School of Chinese Materia Medica, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
  • Wang K; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Therapeutic Substance of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
  • Qiu F; State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Phytochem Anal ; 2024 Aug 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39107233
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Frankincense is used for analgesic, tumor-suppressive, and anti-inflammatory treatments in Traditional Chinese Medicine but poses toxicological concerns. Vinegar processing is a common technique used to reduce the toxicity of frankincense.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to investigate the chemical composition and quality evaluation of raw and vinegar-processing frankincense by multiple UPLC-MS/MS techniques. Additionally, we purposed refining the vinegar processing technique and identifying potentially harmful ingredients in the raw frankincense.

METHODOLOGY:

Sub-chronic oral toxicity studies were conducted on raw and vinegar-processing frankincense in rats. The composition of frankincense was identified by UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS. Chemometrics were used to differentiate between raw and vinegar-processing frankincense. Potential chemical markers were identified by selecting differential components, which were further exactly determined by UPLC-QQQ-MS/MS. Moreover, the viability of the HepG2 cells of those components with reduced contents after vinegar processing was assessed.

RESULTS:

The toxicity of raw frankincense is attenuated by vinegar processing, among which vinegar-processing frankincense (R40) (herb weight rice vinegar weight = 401) exhibited the lowest toxicity. A total of 83 components were identified from frankincense, including 40 triterpenoids, 37 diterpenoids, and 6 other types. The contents of six components decreased after vinegar-processing, with the lowest levels in R40. Three components, specifically 3α-acetoxy-11-keto-ß-boswellic acid (AKBA), 3α-acetoxy-α-boswellic acid (α-ABA), and 3α-acetoxy-ß-boswellic acid (ß-ABA), inhibited the viability of HepG2 cells. The processing of frankincense with vinegar at a ratio of 401 could be an effective method of reducing the toxicity in raw frankincense.

CONCLUSION:

Our research improves understanding of the toxic substance basis and facilitates future assessments of frankincense quality.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Phytochem Anal Asunto de la revista: BOTANICA / QUIMICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Phytochem Anal Asunto de la revista: BOTANICA / QUIMICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article