[Efficacy and safety of Aviandr in the treatment of anxiety in patients with adjustment disorders after COVID-19]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' novogo preparata Aviandr v lechenii trevogi u patsientov s rasstroistvom adaptatsii posle perenesennoi ostroi koronovirusnoi infektsii.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of Aviandr in the treatment of anxiety in patients with adjustment disorders after COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter prospective open-label study included 109 patients of both sexes aged 18 to 65 years (70 women, 39 men, average age - 41.4±13.18 years) with a leading complaint of anxiety (Hamilton scale score, HAM-A ≥18 - ≤24), which arose after acute coronavirus infections. Clinical manifestations had to meet the diagnostic criteria F43.2 ICD-10. The drug Aviander was prescribed 20 mg 2 times a day for 4 weeks. At the end of taking the drug, patients were monitored for another 1 week (a delayed follow-up visit). Psychopathological, statistical and parametric research methods were used using standardized HAM-A, Montgomery-Asberg scales (MADRS), visual analog asthenia scale (VASH-A), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), digital character substitution test (DSST), general clinical impression scale (CGI). RESULTS: Data from 109\110 patients were analyzed to evaluate efficacy\safety. Aviandr was administered 20 mg 2 times daily for 4 weeks. Patients were followed for 1 week (delayed follow-up visit) at the end of treatment. Reducing the intensity of anxiety on the HAM-A scale was - 14.2±4.92 or 69.4±22.66% by the end of treatment. The response rate to therapy (responders are patients with a decrease in the total score on the HAM-A ≥50%) was 83.49%. Remission was achieved (sum of HAM-A scores ≤7) by the end of treatment 68.81% of patients, and 79.8% of patients at the follow-up visit. Significant changes were obtained on the MADRS, VAS-A, SDS and DSST scales. According CGI 45.9% of patients had «much improved¼ and 43.1% of patients had «very much improved¼ by the end of treatment; 58.7% of patients had «much improved¼ and of 33.9% patients had «very much improved¼ at the follow-up visit. 38 adverse events were reported in 27 (24.55%) patients during the study. A definite association with study drug was reported between 5 mild adverse events in 4 (3.64%) patients. No subjects withdrew from the study due to an adverse event. Positive dynamics (reduction of anxiety symptoms, decrease in asthenia) persisted after discontinuation of the study drug. No cases of withdrawal syndrome were observed. CONCLUSION: According to the results of the study, the anxiolytic, antidepressant, antiasthenic and pro-cognitive effects of Aviandr were observed. An increase in the social activity of patients was observed.