Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The adjustment disorder is not a wastebasket diagnosis: a grounded theory study of psychiatrists' and psychologists' clinical reasoning.
Zapata-Ospina, Juan Pablo; Sierra-Muñoz, Jhon Styven; Martínez, Pablo Madrid; Enrique Yepes-Delgado, Carlos.
Afiliación
  • Zapata-Ospina JP; Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Academic Group in Clinical Epidemiology (GRAEPIC), Medellín, Colombia.
  • Sierra-Muñoz JS; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Martínez PM; Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Enrique Yepes-Delgado C; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Eur J Psychotraumatol ; 15(1): 2390332, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39166284
ABSTRACT

Background:

the aim of this study is to understand the diagnostic process undertaken by psychiatrists and psychologists regarding adjustment disorder (AD) in their clinical practice and how they differentiate it from major depressive episode (MDE).

Methods:

A hermeneutic study using grounded theory techniques was carried out. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve psychiatrists and eight psychologists in Colombia, and transcribed verbatim. Initial line-by-line coding was performed, followed by focused and axial coding to construct categories explaining the professionals' reasoning process.

Results:

The clinical reasoning of professionals regarding AD was understood through four major categories. (1) Difficulty in addressing the experience of stressful events, as there is a risk of pathologizing and medicalizing them. (2) Mental health diagnoses are necessary but not apodictic. (3) The diagnostic category of AD allows for the description of a fluctuating depressive and anxious syndrome occurring in reaction to a stressful event, whose abnormality criteria are based on intersubjective knowledge of the patient's life history and consequential reasoning regarding the need for professional support. (4) The AD label could potentially protect against overdiagnosis of MDE and overuse of antidepressants. Many clinicians in their practice thus subordinate the diagnosis of MDE to ensuring it is not AD, contrary to what is outlined in diagnostic manuals.

Conclusion:

This study allowed us to understand the clinical reasoning of psychiatrists and psychologists about AD as a diagnosis that inherently indicates the need to work on coping and intervene in the stressor and should be considered as a diagnostic possibility in the same hierarchy as MDE in reactive syndromes, rather than a residual category.
Clinicians use consequential and intersubjective reasoning to diagnose Adjustment Disorder (AD).Systemic pressures lead to overdiagnosis of Major Depressive Episode (MDE) and excessive antidepressant use.AD should be recognized as a valid non-residual diagnostic category.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psiquiatría / Trastornos de Adaptación / Teoría Fundamentada / Razonamiento Clínico País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Colombia Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Psychotraumatol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psiquiatría / Trastornos de Adaptación / Teoría Fundamentada / Razonamiento Clínico País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Colombia Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Psychotraumatol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article