Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of lesion insertion tool in pelvis PET/MR data with applications to attenuation correction method development.
Natsuaki, Yutaka; Leynes, Andrew; Wangerin, Kristen; Hamdi, Mahdjoub; Rajagopal, Abhejit; Kinahan, Paul E; Laforest, Richard; Larson, Peder E Z; Hope, Thomas A; James, Sara St.
Afiliación
  • Natsuaki Y; Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Leynes A; iSono Health Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Wangerin K; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Hamdi M; Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Rajagopal A; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Kinahan PE; University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Laforest R; Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Larson PEZ; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Hope TA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • James SS; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; : e14507, 2024 Sep 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39231184
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In modern positron emission tomography (PET) with multi-modality imaging (e.g., PET/CT and PET/MR), the attenuation correction (AC) is the single largest correction factor for image reconstruction. One way to assess AC methods and other reconstruction parameters is to utilize software-based simulation tools, such as a lesion insertion tool. Extensive validation of these simulation tools is required to ensure results of the study are clinically meaningful.

PURPOSE:

To evaluate different PET AC methods using a synthetic lesion insertion tool that simulates lesions in a patient cohort that has both PET/MR and PET/CT images. To further demonstrate how lesion insertion tool may be used to extend knowledge of PET reconstruction parameters, including but not limited to AC.

METHODS:

Lesion quantitation is compared using conventional Dixon-based MR-based AC (MRAC) to that of using CT-based AC (CTAC, a "ground truth"). First, the pre-existing lesions were simulated in a similar environment; a total of 71 lesions were identified in 18 pelvic PET/MR patient images acquired with a time-of-flight simultaneous PET/MR scanner, and matched lesions were inserted contralaterally on the same axial slice. Second, synthetic lesions were inserted into four anatomic target locations in a cohort of four patients who didn't have any observed clinical lesions in the pelvis.

RESULTS:

The matched lesion insertions resulted in unity between the lesion error ratios (mean SUVs), demonstrating that the inserted lesions successfully simulated the original lesions. In the second study, the inserted lesions had distinct characteristics by target locations and demonstrated negative max-SUV%diff trends for bone-dominant sites across the patient cohort.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current work demonstrates that the applied lesion insertion tool can simulate uptake in pelvic lesions and their expected SUV values, and that the lesion insertion tool can be extended to evaluate further PET reconstruction corrections and algorithms and their impact on quantitation accuracy and precision.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys / J. appl. clin. med. phys / Journal of applied clinical medical physics Asunto de la revista: BIOFISICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys / J. appl. clin. med. phys / Journal of applied clinical medical physics Asunto de la revista: BIOFISICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article