Pterygoid and tuberosity implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: A retrospective cohort study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Rehabilitation of the partially or completely edentulous posterior maxilla using dental implants is a clinical challenge because of the presence of the maxillary sinus, as well as the low quality and quantity of bone in that region. In addition to bone augmentation procedures, posterior maxillary rehabilitation using implants includes their anchoring in bones such as the zygoma, pterygoid, and maxillary tuberosity, as well as in short implants. However, the performance of pterygoid and tuberosity implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the survival of tuberosity and pterygoid implants in patients with posterior maxillary atrophy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A nonprobability convenient sample of patients who had received fixed prostheses on implants placed in the maxillary tuberosity or pterygoid regions was analyzed retrospectively. Demographic variables included sex (male, female) and age. Implant-related variables included surface characteristics, site of placement, implant design, length, diameter, and anteroposterior insertion angle. Prosthetic-related variables included the type of reconstruction for rehabilitation and loading protocols. Implant survival, complications, crestal bone loss, and follow-up intervals were also documented. Collected data were analyzed at both patient and implant levels. The demographics and implant characteristics of patients receiving pterygoid or tuberosity implants were analyzed with a statistical software program (α=.05). Survival analysis was estimated by using the nonparametric Kaplan-Meier curve. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients had 183 pterygoid or tuberosity implants inserted. Most implants in the pterygoid region (71.5%) were Ø4.1 mm (87.4%) and 15 mm in length (60.1%). The most common prostheses were complete maxillary reconstructions (49.2%) with late loading (74.3%). The average implant anteroposterior insertion angle was 60.8 degrees. The cumulative survival rate was 97.3% (n=178) during the mean follow-up period of 57 months (range 1 to 168 months). Among all implants placed, 2.7% failed (n=5) within 2 months of their placement. The statistically significant differences noted between tuberosity and pterygoid implants were related to design, surface characteristics, and loading. The average crestal bone loss was 1.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The survival of the implants placed in the maxillary tuberosity and pterygoid regions was high in patients with posterior maxillary atrophy.

Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: Patient-reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of Working Group 3 was to focus on three topics that were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). These topics included the following: (a) the aesthetics of tooth and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses focusing on partially edentulous patients, (b) a comparison of fixed and removable implant-retained prostheses for edentulous populations, and (c) immediate versus early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentate patients. PROMs include ratings of satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (QHRQoL), as well as other indicators, that is, pain, general health-related quality of life (e.g., SF-36). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Consensus Conference Group 3 participants discussed the findings of the three systematic review manuscripts. Following comprehensive discussions, participants developed consensus statements and recommendations that were then discussed in larger plenary sessions. Following this, any necessary modifications were made and approved. RESULTS: Patients were very satisfied with the aesthetics of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and the surrounding mucosa. Implant neck design, restorative material, or use of a provisional restoration did not influence patients' ratings. Edentulous patients highly rate both removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses. However, they rate their ability to maintain their oral hygiene significantly higher with the removable prosthesis. Both immediate provisionalization and conventional loading receive positive patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported outcome measures should be gathered in every clinical study in which the outcomes of oral rehabilitation with dental implants are investigated. PROMs, such as patients' satisfaction and QHRQoL, should supplement other clinical parameters in our clinical definition of success.

A retrospective observational cohort study evaluating the postoperative outcomes of intracapsular coblation tonsillectomy in children.

Coblation intracapsular tonsillectomy (ICT) is becoming popular due to its decreased postoperative complications. However, a concern exists about the need for revision surgery. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study, with a null hypothesis that Coblation ICT is not associated with recurrence of the preoperative symptoms, obstructive tonsillar regrowth, or the need for revision tonsillar surgery. We reviewed 345 patients (median age of 4.5 years; IQR 3.2-6.3), operated by the senior author between Feb 2017 and Sep 2020, for a median follow-up of 395.0 days (IQR 221.5-654.5). Most patients had snoring (94.2%), mouth breathing (92.8%), restless sleep (62.6%), and sleep disorder breathing (52.8%); 12.5% had recurrent tonsillitis. The mean initial total symptoms score (TSS) was 5.2 (SD 1.4, range 1-8); 87.5% had three or more symptoms; 86.7% underwent ICT; TSS decreased postoperatively to a mean of 0.2, SD 0.8, range 0-7. The mean hospital stay was 0.96 day (SD 0.36, range 0-3). Secondary bleeding occurred in 0.7% of ICT patients. No patient required admission or intervention. There was no documented tonsillar regrowth resulting in upper airway obstruction. No one needed tonsillar revision surgery. Intracapsular tonsillectomy was shown to be an effective procedure with long-lasting results.

An evaluation of an array of viruses and fungi in adult Lebanese patients presenting with various dental infections: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: The role of bacteria in the pathogenesis of periodontitis, pericoronitis, and periapical infections has been well-established. However, the variation in the severity and prognosis of these lesions could suggest a potential role of other microorganisms, such as viruses and fungi. This study aims to evaluate the presence of adenovirus, human papillomavirus-16, Epstein-Barr virus, Candida, and non-Candida fungi in these infections. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study including 120 healthy adult patients presenting with dental infections requiring dental extractions were conducted to assess the prevalence and the relative quantity of viruses and fungi in saliva, infected, and healthy tissues using quantitative polymerase chain reaction tests. Samples were collected, and a categorical scale was used for the prevalence and a continuous scale for the relative quantification. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square for the prevalence and Wilcoxon rank test for the relative quantification. RESULTS: Except for the Epstein-Barr virus and Candida, the presence of viruses and fungi was significantly associated with dental infections. Adenovirus showed an association with pericoronitis, while human papilloma virus-16 exhibited an association with periapical infections. Non-Candida fungi, on the other hand, showed a positive association with all infected tissues and saliva as compared to healthy control lesions except for periapical infections. CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, viruses and fungi were found to be prevalent in dental infections. However, their associations with those infections vary depending on the types of viruses or fungi involved and the category of dental infections.

The incidence of reoperation after temporomandibular joint arthroscopic surgery: a retrospective study of 450 consecutive joints.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of reoperation after temporomandibular joint arthroscopic surgery in 315 consecutive patients (488 joints). STUDY DESIGN: The clinical data and operative reports of all patients who underwent arthroscopic procedures from 1995 to 2000 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients had a preoperative clinical and panoramic radiographic evaluation. Most of the patients had disk displacement without reduction. In the remaining patients, the intra-articular pathologic conditions ranged from disk displacement with reduction to degenerative joint disease. The outcome assessment was based on reduction in pain, improvement in vertical dimension of mouth opening, and mandibular excursions. The same surgical team performed all arthroscopic procedures. Before surgery, all patients received at least 3 to 6 months of nonsurgical therapy consisting of anti-inflammatory medications, muscle relaxants, splint therapy, physiotherapy, exercise, moist heat, cold laser, ultrasound, and soft diet or a combination thereof. Patients were monitored postoperatively for as long as 5 years. RESULTS: Results showed that approximately 20% of those patients who had temporomandibular joint arthroscopic surgery underwent further temporomandibular joint procedures ranging from repeat arthroscopic surgery to open-joint arthrotomy. CONCLUSION: Temporomandibular joint surgical arthroscopy is an appropriate therapeutic modality for patients with temporomandibular joint internal derangements, with reoperation required for only 20% of patients.