The in vivo biocompatibility of titanized polypropylene lightweight mesh is superior to that of conventional polypropylene mesh.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the histological response to and changes in the biomechanical properties of titanized polypropylene lightweight mesh and conventional polypropylene mesh at 1 and 12 weeks following implantation in the sheep vagina. METHODS: We compared a titanized polypropylene lightweight mesh (TiLOOP Mesh) to a conventional polypropylene mesh (Gynemesh PS) in a sheep vagina model. Explants were harvested after 1 and 12 weeks (n = 6/mesh type/time point) for histological observation. After 12 weeks, mesh-tissue complex specimens were biomechanically assessed by a uniaxial tension system. RESULTS: One week after implantation, there was no significant difference in the inflammatory response between the two groups. Twelve weeks after implantation, the TiLOOP light mesh elicited a lower inflammatory response than was observed for the Gynemesh PS (1.44 ± 0.61 vs 2.05 ± 0.80, P = .015). Twelve weeks after implantation, the collagen I/III ratio was lower in the TiLOOP light mesh group than in the Gynemesh PS group (9.41 ± 5.06 vs 15.21 ± 8.21, P = .019). The messenger RNA expression levels of the inflammatory factors interleukin 10 and tumor necrosis factor α were lower in the TiLOOP Mesh group than in the Gynemesh PS group at both 1 and 12 weeks (P < .05). There were no significant differences in any of the evaluated biomechanical characteristics between the two meshes (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Although the titanized polypropylene lightweight mesh induces slightly less tissue reactivity and has better in vivo biocompatibility, further studies should be conducted including the complications and the success rate of pelvic organ prolapse in patients before recommending it in pelvic floor reconstruction.

Experimental study of a new original mesh developed for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Most synthetic meshes used in transvaginal surgery are made of polypropylene, which has a stable performance, but does not easily degrade in vivo. However, mesh-related complications are difficult to address and have raised serious concerns. A new biomaterial mesh with good tissue integration and few mesh-related complications is needed. To evaluate the effect of a new bacterial cellulose (BC) mesh on pelvic floor reconstruction following implantation in the vagina of sheep after 1 and 12 weeks. METHODS: The meshes were implanted in the submucosa of the posterior vagina wall of sheep. At 1 and 12 weeks after surgery, mesh-tissue complex (MTC) specimens were harvested for histological studies and biomechanical evaluation. At 12 weeks after surgery, MTC specimens were biomechanically assessed by a uniaxial tension "pulley system". RESULTS: The BC mesh elicited a higher inflammatory response than Gynemesh™PS at both 1 and 12 weeks after implantation. Twelve weeks after implantation, the BC mesh resulted in less fibrosis than Gynemesh™PS. Compared with the Gynemesh™PS group, the BC mesh group had increased mRNA expression of MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-9 (P < 0.05), but decreased expression of the anti-inflammatory factor IL-4 (P < 0.05). Twelve weeks after implantation, the ultimate load and maximum elongation percentage of the BC mesh were significantly lower than those of Gynemesh™PS. CONCLUSIONS: The BC mesh could not be a promising biomaterial for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery unless the production process and parameters were improved.