Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Circ J ; 70(3): 273-7, 2006 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16501292

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As a result of longer follow-up after implantation of cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), fatigue of the leads has become a concern. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and clinical presentation of ICD lead failures. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 241 patients with 249 ICD leads who underwent implantation of an ICD with a transvenous lead system. After device implantation, the patients were routinely followed up every 4 months. Five lead failures (2.0%) occurred as an oversensing of artifact during the follow-up period (2.6+/-2.1 years); 4 of those 5 patients received inappropriate shocks and 1 case of lead failure was identified in a patient with frequent episodes of non-sustained ventricular fibrillation. In particular, the right ventricular polyurethane transvenous lead in the Medtronic model 6936 failed in 4 (13%) of 31 cases. Percutaneous lead extraction was not available in all cases, so an additional ICD lead was inserted through the same site of the subclavian vein. CONCLUSIONS: Lead failures may occur 5 years after ICD implantation and polyurethane leads have an especially high incidence of failure. However, there were no follow-up parameters observed that predicted lead failures.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables/normas , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Instalación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Instalación Eléctrica/normas , Poliuretanos , Adulto , Anciano , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Análisis de Falla de Equipo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA