Insights into the ANKRD11 variants and short-stature phenotype through literature review and ClinVar database search.

Ankyrin repeat domain containing-protein 11 (ANKRD11), a transcriptional factor predominantly localized in the cell nucleus, plays a crucial role in the expression regulation of key genes by recruiting chromatin remodelers and interacting with specific transcriptional repressors or activators during numerous biological processes. Its pathogenic variants are strongly linked to the pathogenesis and progression of multisystem disorder known as KBG syndrome. With the widespread application of high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies in clinical medicine, numerous pathogenic variants in the ANKRD11 gene have been reported. Patients with KBG syndrome usually exhibit a broad phenotypic spectrum with a variable degree of severity, even if having identical variants. In addition to distinctive dental, craniofacial and neurodevelopmental abnormalities, patients often present with skeletal anomalies, particularly postnatal short stature. The relationship between ANKRD11 variants and short stature is not well-understood, with limited knowledge regarding its occurrence rate or underlying biological mechanism involved. This review aims to provide an updated analysis of the molecular spectrum associated with ANKRD11 variants, investigate the prevalence of the short stature among patients harboring these variants, evaluate the efficacy of recombinant human growth hormone in treating children with short stature and ANKRD11 variants, and explore the biological mechanisms underlying short stature from both scientific and clinical perspectives. Our investigation indicated that frameshift and nonsense were the most frequent types in 583 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants identified in the ANKRD11 gene. Among the 245 KBGS patients with height data, approximately 50% displayed short stature. Most patients showed a positive response to rhGH therapy, although the number of patients receiving treatment was limited. ANKRD11 deficiency potentially disrupts longitudinal bone growth by affecting the orderly differentiation of growth plate chondrocytes. Our review offers crucial insights into the association between ANKRD11 variants and short stature and provides valuable guidance for precise clinical diagnosis and treatment of patients with KBG syndrome.

Real-world study of antiresorptive-related osteonecrosis of jaw based on the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system database.

Objective: This study aims to explore the risk signals of osteonecrosis of the jaw induced by antiresorptive drugs and provide references for the clinical safety application. Method: According to the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), from January 2004 to September 2021, we chose "Osteonecrosis of the jaw (10064658)" and "Exposed bone in jaw (10071014)" as preferred terms, "antiresorptive drugs" as the target drugs, and primary suspect drug as the drug role code in the dataset. We evaluated the association between drugs and adverse events by using reporting odds ratio (ROR) based on disproportionality analysis. We took the High-Level Terms (HLT) of MedDRA® as the classification level of indications to calculate ROR to compare the signal difference of ONJ in different indications. In addition, patients with antiresorptive-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw and the time of onset of the condition following different antiresorptive medications were collected for the study. Results: The FAERS contained 18,421 reports relating to jaw osteonecrosis from January 2004 to September 2021. A total of eight antiresorptive agents were included in the analysis. From high to low, the ROR of ONJ induced by antiresorptive agents (regardless of indication) is pamidronate (ROR = 494.8), zoledronic acid (ROR = 431.9), denosumab (ROR = 194.8), alendronate (ROR = 151.2), risedronate (ROR = 140.2), etidronic acid (ROR = 64.5), ibandronate (ROR = 40.8), and romosozumab (ROR = 6.4). HLT ROR values for "metabolic bone disorders" were the lowest for each drug, while HLT ROR values were high for "tumor-related indications," including breast and nipple neoplasms malignant, plasma cell myelomas, and prostatic neoplasms malignant. The onset time for osteonecrosis of the jaw as median (Q1, Q3), osteoporosis-related indications, and the onset time for ONJ were 730 (368, 1268), 489.5 (236.3, 909.8), 722.5 (314, 1055), 761 (368, 1720), and 153 (50, 346) for zoledronic acid, denosumab, ibandronate, risedronate, and romosozumab, respectively. Cancer-related indications: the onset time for ONJ were 680.5 (255.3, 1283), 488 (245, 851), and 696.5 (347, 1087) for zoledronic acid, denosumab, and pamidronate, respectively. Conclusion: When antiresorptive drugs are used for metastasis, they have the largest risk signal, followed by malignancy, and the smallest is osteoporosis. The onset time of ONJ may not be related to the indications. The onset time of ONJ for BPs was about 2 years, denosumab about 1.3 years, and romosozumab less than 1 year, which may be related to sequential treatment. When used according to the instructions, the risk of ONJ caused by denosumab was higher than that of zoledronic acid, regardless of the indication. Based on these findings, researchers will continue to monitor and identify risk factors.

Effect of premolar extraction and presence of the lower third molar on lower second molar angulation in orthodontic treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change in mandibular second-molar (M2) angulation in orthodontic treatment with premolar extraction and lower third molar (M3). STUDY DESIGN: Panoramic radiographs were evaluated in 3 groups of 129 participants: (1) control, no orthodontic treatment (n = 65); (2) extraction, orthodontic treatment with premolar extraction (n = 30); and (3) nonextraction, orthodontic treatment without premolar extraction (n = 34). The angular difference and ratio of M2 to the first molar (M1), the change in the angulation of M2 between pre- and postorthodontic treatment, and the distal bone level of M2 were assessed. RESULTS: The angular difference and ratio of M2 to M1, the angulation change of M2 between pre- and postorthodontic treatment, and the distal bone level of M2 were higher in the nonextraction group than in the control and extraction groups. CONCLUSIONS: The successful orthodontic alignment of the M2 may not be achieved in nonextraction cases when the M3s are present.