Endoscope-assisted transoral reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures--a prospective double-center study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this international AO-study was to compare the functional outcome after open versus closed treatment of mandibular condylar neck fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective comparative study with two follow-ups (FU) at 8-12 weeks and 1 year was undertaken in two clinics, which exclusively privileged either surgical or conservative treatment due to different therapeutic agendas. Patients from clinic 1 (ENDO group) received endoscope-assisted transoral open reduction and internal fixation, whereas patients from clinic 2 (CONS group) were treated conservatively without surgery. Patients with unilateral condylar neck fractures showing one or more of the following conditions were included: displacement of the condyle with an inclination >30° and/or severe functional impairment such as malocclusion or open bite, with or without dislocation of the condylar fragment; severe pain upon palpation or movement, and/or vertical shortening of the ascending ramus. High or intracapsular condylar neck fractures were excluded. RESULTS: 75 patients (44 CONS and 31 ENDO patients) with condylar neck fractures were included in this study. The Asymmetric Helkimo Dysfunction Score (A-HDS) was slightly lower in the CONS group than in the ENDO group at the 8-12-week FU, corresponding to better function on the short-term. At the 1-year FU, however, there were slightly better values in the ENDO group. For the Clinical Dysfunction Index (Di) and the Anamnestic Dysfunction Index (Ai), CONS patients had a better outcome than ENDO patients at the 8-12 week FU, ie, a higher proportion of ENDO patients had severe symptoms due to the operative trauma. Yet these symptoms improved by one year, finishing with a significant higher proportion of symptom-free patients in the ENDO group. In addition, these patients had better values for the Index for Occlusion and Articulation Disturbance (Oi) at both FU examinations, ie, the proportion of patients without any occlusal disturbances was significantly higher in the ENDO group. On average, the duration of postoperative maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF) was 3 times longer for the CONS group than for the ENDO group (33 vs. 11 days). CONCLUSION: Both treatment options may yield acceptable results for displaced condylar neck fractures. Especially in patients with severe malocclusion directly after trauma, however, endoscope-assisted transoral open reduction and fixation seems to be the appropriate treatment for prevention of occlusal disturbances during FU.

Serratus anterior free flap in oral reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Perforating oral and maxillofacial defects frequently cause severe functional disorders. Microvascular free flaps like the radial forearm flap and the latissimus dorsi flap have been described to cover those defects; however, harvest of the radial forearm flap causes remarkable donor-site morbidity, while the latissimus dorsi flap often turns out to be too bulky. Therefore we introduce the serratus anterior muscle as a versatile and reliable microvascular flap to cover defects of both the floor of the mouth and the maxilla. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2007, 10 oral defects were reconstructed using the serratus anterior flap. In 5 of the cases, the defects were located at the hard palate and maxilla, while in the other cases they were located in the floor of the mouth. RESULTS: All of the patients were able to feed orally within the first week postoperatively. Donor-site morbidity was observed to be negligible not least because of the achievement of primary tension-free wound closure. Successful reconstruction could be observed in 8 of 10 patients. CONCLUSION: Although the serratus anterior muscle flap lacks an epithelial layer, this flap is not restricted to a subcutaneous placement. Due to rapid epithelialization, the serratus anterior muscle is even suitable for perforating intraoral defects.

Pediatric mandibular resection and reconstruction: long-term results with autogenous rib grafts.

Reconstruction of mandibular defects following tumor resection in infants is a particular challenge. Although autogenous rib grafts have no relevance in the restoration of mandibular bone defects occurring after ablative tumor surgery due to limited bone stock and the availability of other donor areas, they are a useful surgical alternative following tumor surgery in infants. We here report on a 2, 5, 8, and 15-year follow-up of four children who were diagnosed with benign tumors of the mandible with osseous destruction at the age of 4, 6, 15, and 18 months, respectively. Histologic diagnoses were melanotic neuroectodermal tumor (n = 2), hemangioendothelioma of the mandible (n = 1), and ameloblastoma (n = 1). Following continuity resection of the mandible, lateromandibular bone defects were restored using autogenous rib grafts. Both clinical and radiologic follow-up visits were performed for all children to assess growth of the facial skeleton and the mandible. One child was already further reconstructed using bone augmentation at the age of 15 years. Cephalometric measurements on panorex films and three-dimensional computed tomographic scans revealed a slight vertical growth excess and transversal growth inhibition of the reconstructed mandible compared with the nonoperated side. Although further growth of rib grafts is difficult to predict and occlusal disharmony may occur due to physiologic maxillary growth and growth of the unaffected mandible, we believe that autogenous rib grafts can be ideally used for the restoration of mandibular continuity defects in newborns and young children. Clinical follow-up visits on a yearly basis and orthodontic controls are useful for early orthodontic treatment of growth deficits. Further corrective surgery with bone augmentation or osseous distraction is required following completion of growth of the facial skeleton.