Anonymous HIV surveillance in Saughton Prison, Edinburgh.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of HIV by anonymous saliva testing in Her Majesty's Prison, Saughton (Saughton Prison), Edinburgh, UK. To elicit linked anonymous risk factor information from which to estimate risk scores for those who had taken an HIV blood test and, among drug injectors, for those who were HIV-1-antibody-positive on saliva testing. SETTING: Saughton Prison on 15 and 16 August 1991; HIV Immunology and Regional Virus Laboratories, Edinburgh, and the Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Male inmates (378 out of a total of 499) of Saughton Prison. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Answers to a brief questionnaire about age, usual residence, present and past custodial sentences, drug injecting and sexual behaviour prior to and in prison, HIV testing and history of acute hepatitis. HIV-1-antibody status was established by saliva testing. RESULTS: Eighteen per cent of participants were injecting drug users (IDU), of whom approximately one-half (47%) had injected while inside prison. Ninety men (26%), including 40 (14%) of 278 participants who had never injected drugs and 77% of IDU participants, had taken an HIV blood test. Nine per cent of all participants and 35% of IDU participants had had an acute attack of hepatitis. Forty-one (62%) of 66 IDU had been imprisoned five or more times before their current prison sentence. After taking account of region of residence, injecting drug history and acute hepatitis, aspects of sentencing and sexual behaviour were not determinants of those who had been tested for HIV. On the study days, 18 out of 499 (3.6%) participants were known to prison medical officers to be HIV-infected. Following saliva testing, HIV prevalence was 17 out of 375 (4.5%) inmates tested. All 17 had at some time 'taken the blood test for HIV' and all had injected non-medically prescribed drugs. Edinburgh residence, age 26-30 years, have injected in prison and having first injected before 1983 all contributed to the risk score for whether an IDU was HIV-1-antibody-positive on saliva testing. CONCLUSIONS: Documented HIV prevalence in saliva was 4.5%, which--assuming no volunteer bias (as supported by questionnaire returns)--suggests that actual HIV prevalence was 25% greater than revealed to Saughton's prison medical service. All 17 inmates who were HIV-1-antibody-positive on saliva testing had injected non-medically prescribed drugs. The high reported frequency by inmates of injecting in prison highlights the urgent requirement for drug reduction and rehabilitation programmes for injecting inmates. Linked anonymous voluntary HIV testing of saliva can provide valuable information about HIV prevalence for the planning of prison resources and policy.

Addition of polyethylene glycol 6000 improves the sensitivity of the protein A plaque assay for detection of human immunoglobulin secreting cells.

A technical modification of the protein A plaque assay is described in which the addition of polyethylene glycol 6000 results in increased sensitivity in detection of human immunoglobulin secreting cells. Optimal conditions for use of this modification are described which result in improved detection and visualisation of haemolytic zones and have, with continued use, been shown to improve the reproducibility and reliability of this assay.

Prevalence of hepatitis C in prisons: WASH-C surveillance linked to self-reported risk behaviours.

We used cross-sectional willing anonymous salivary hepatitis C (WASH-C) surveillance linked to self-completed risk-factor questionnaires to estimate the prevalence of salivary hepatitis C antibodies (HepCAbS) in five Scottish prisons from 1994 to 1996. Of 2121 available inmates, 1864 (88%) participated and 1532/1864 (82%) stored samples were suitable for testing. Overall 311/1532 (20.3%, prevalence 95% CI 18.3-22.3%) were HepCAbS-positive: 265/536 (49%, 95% CI 45-54%) injector-inmates but only 27/899 (3%, 95% CI 2-4%) non-injector-inmates. Among injectors, HepCAbS positivity was only slightly higher (p = 0.03) in those who had injected inside prison (53%, 162/305) than in those who had not (44%, 98/224). Those who began injecting in 1992-96 were much less likely to be HepCAbS-positive than those who started pre-1992 (31%, 35/114 vs. 55%, 230/422; p < 0.001). Even with injectors who began in 1992-96 but had never injected inside prison, the prevalence of hepatitis C carriage was 17/63 (95% CI 16-38%). The prevalence and potential transmissibility of hepatitis C in injector-inmates are both high. Promoting 'off injecting' before 'off drugs' (both inside and outside prison), methadone prescription during short incarcerations, alternatives to prison, and support of HepCAbS-positive inmates in becoming eligible for treatment, all warrant urgent consideration.

Occupational risk and precautions related to HIV infection among dentists in the Lothian region of Scotland.

This retrospective study used a postal questionnaire to measure occupational risks and to assess infection control procedures among 310 dental practitioners. The study comprised general dental practices in the Lothian region of Scotland, Lothian Health Board Community Dental Service and Edinburgh Dental Hospital. Altogether, 217 dental practitioners responded by the due date giving recall of inoculation injuries within the previous 5 years and infection control measures employed. The study revealed that 191 practitioners (88%) had completed a course of hepatitis B vaccination but one-third of them had not been tested for post-vaccination antibody. In 1991, two thirds of dentists (66%: 137 of 207 respondents) wore the same pair of gloves, and 80% of dentists (142 of 177 respondents) wore the same mask, for dealing with more than one patient. The usual practice was to change gloves during sessions (44%: out of 71 dentists) and to change masks for each session or less often (75%: 73 out of 97 dentists). The proportion of dentists who never used gloves fell from 56% in 1981 to 1% in 1991. An autoclave was used for sterilisation by 85% of practitioners in 1991. Reported non-sterile inoculation injuries averaged 1.7 (S.D. = 3.2) injuries per dentist in the previous year with 56% of practitioners having had an injury. The average was 6.8 (S.D. = 15.9) injuries per dentist in the previous 5 years with 76% of practitioners having had an injury. Of recent non-sterile inoculation injuries described by dental practitioners, 30% constituted a moderate or high risk of transmission of infection to the practitioner (43 of 141 described injuries). Combined with HIV seroprevalance rates, probabilities of transmission and numbers of practising dentists, the mean reported number of non-sterile inoculation injuries in the previous 5 years may be used to provide estimates of expected numbers of dental practitioners occupationally infected with HIV in the previous 5 years. U.K. estimates were 0.004 dentists in Lothian region and 0.05 dentists in the Thames region occupationally infected with HIV in the previous five years. Non-sterile inoculation injuries appear to be a common hazard of dental practice. In any year, most dentists are exposed to the risk of blood-borne viral infection. Despite a high reported incidence of such injuries, dental practice within the U.K. appears to carry a low risk of acquiring HIV infection from occupational exposure.

Anonymous HIV surveillance with risk-factor elicitation: at Perth (for men) and Cornton Vale (for women) prisons in Scotland.

434 male and 145 female prisoners were available to participate in cross-sectional, voluntary anonymous HIV surveillance (using saliva samples) with linked self-completion questionnaire at HMP (Her Majesty's Prison) Perth on 17 May and at HMP Cornton Vale on 18 May 1995. Three hundred and four men (70%) and 136 women (94%) completed a risk-factor questionnaire and 304 and 135 samples were received for HIV antibody testing. Two hundred and eighty-two and 132 questionnaires passed logical checks. Six saliva samples from Perth (all injectors) out of 304 and none from Cornton Vale out of 134 tested were HIV antibody positive. Four were presumptively from known HIV-infected male inmates; the other 2 were local men, under 26 years, who began injecting in 1989-91, and both reported having had a recent HIV test. Overall HIV prevalence was estimated at 2% compared to a known prevalence of 1.4% (6/434), giving a 1.5 ratio of overall: disclosed HIV prevalence at HMP Perth. HIV prevalence was estimated at 7% (6/82) for injector-participants and 14% (5/35) for local injector participants. At Cornton Vale, where both known HIV-infected inmates abstained, overall and disclosed HIV prevalence, were equal at 1.4%. At Perth Prison, 29% of prisoners had injected drugs (82/278); 85% of injector-inmates reported having injected inside (some prison and 31% (25/80) had started to inject while inside, 7 during their present sentence. Of all 21 injector-inmates who first injected after 1991, 10 had started to inject inside, including one of 69 male inmates who had never been inside before. The corresponding figures for Cornton Vale, where 46% of inmates were injectors (58/132), were that 57% of injector-inmates had injected inside (32/56) but only one woman, for whom this was not her first sentence, had started to inject inside. Twenty-eight per cent of male prisoners (78/277) and 57% of male injector-inmates (47/82) had had a personal HIV test since January 1993, as had 35% of female prisoners (43/124) and 57% of female injector-inmates (30/53). A much higher proportion of Glasgow's female prisoners (64%: 38/60) were injectors than of women prisoners from the Edinburgh, Dundee and Fife area (21%: 5/26) or from elsewhere (34%: 15/45). Rape was reported by 23% of women (30/130). Women who had been raped had a more polarized distribution of male sexual partners (none to 2 plus) in the year before sentencing than other women and were more likely to report anal sex (11/30 vs 11/100, P < 0.001). Prostitution had been engaged in by 19% of female injector-inmates (11/57) and was acknowledged by one other woman. However, only 5% of women (6/130) reported ever having been treated for an STD.

Complement activation in haemodialysis: a comparison of new and re-used dialysers.

The magnitude of leucopenia and complement activation when reusing cellulose based (Cuprophan) and synthetic (polyacrylonitrile AN-69S) haemodialysis membranes as well as their modifications by the priming of the dialysers with fresh frozen plasma and by the introduction of a period of stagnation during haemodialysis were studied using radioimmunoassay (C3a), centrifugal analysis (C3d), immunochemical (C3, Factor B) and functional (CH50 and alternate pathway) assays. Our findings demonstrate that complement activation and leucopenia induced by Cuprophan are linked and are modified when the membrane is reused, or primed with plasma protein. However, chemical exposure during reuse to sodium hypochlorite modifies these observations. Reuse of the AN-69S membrane resulted in no modification of either leucopenia or complement activity, but this membrane consistently demonstrated lower levels of C3a than observed with either first use or reused Cuprophan membranes.

Recent non-sterile inoculation injuries to dental professionals in the Lothian region of Scotland.

A retrospective study of inoculation injuries in dental practice was conducted by means of a questionnaire distributed to 310 dental practitioners in the Lothian region of Scotland. Recent injuries were independently classified by a hospital dentist, general dental practitioner and immunologist as constituting high, moderate or low risk of transmission to the dentist. A consultant physician in infectious diseases assessed the follow-up actions. The results indicate that non-sterile inoculation injuries are a common hazard of dental practice with 56% of respondents reporting at least one such injury within the last year. A total of 30% of reported injuries constituted a moderate or high risk of transmission to the dental practitioner. Action taken following such injuries was often considered to be inadequate. While many injuries could possibly be avoided by changes in surgery design, avoidance of other injuries would probably require fundamental changes in routine dental practice. While the incidence of such injuries is high, dental practice within the UK appears to be associated with a low risk of acquiring HIV infection by occupational exposure. The increasing awareness of the importance of other blood-borne viral infections makes this a continuing issue.

Harm reduction measures and injecting inside prison versus mandatory drugs testing: results of a cross sectional anonymous questionnaire survey. The European Commission Network on HIV Infection and Hepatitis in Prison.

OBJECTIVES: (a) To determine both the frequency of injecting inside prison and use of sterilising tablets to clean needles in the previous four weeks; (b) to assess the efficiency of random mandatory drugs testing at detecting prisoners who inject heroin inside prison; (c) to determine the percentage of prisoners who had been offered vaccination against hepatitis B. DESIGN: Cross sectional willing anonymous salivary HIV surveillance linked to a self completion risk factor questionnaire. SETTING: Lowmoss prison, Glasgow, and Aberdeen prison on 11 and 30 October 1996. SUBJECTS: 293 (94%) of all 312 inmates at Lowmoss and 146 (93%) of all 157 at Aberdeen, resulting in 286 and 143 valid questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of injecting inside prison in the previous four weeks by injector inmates who had been in prison for at least four weeks. RESULTS: 116 (41%) Lowmoss and 53 (37%) Aberdeen prisoners had a history of injecting drug use but only 4% of inmates (17/395; 95% confidence interval 2% to 6%) had ever been offered vaccination against hepatitis B. 42 Lowmoss prisoners (estimated 207 injections and 258 uses of sterilising tablets) and 31 Aberdeen prisoners (229 injections, 221 uses) had injected inside prison in the previous four weeks. The prisons together held 112 injector inmates who had been in prison for more than four weeks, of whom 57 (51%; 42% to 60%) had injected in prison in the past four weeks; their estimated mean number of injections was 6.0 (SD 5.7). Prisoners injecting heroin six times in four weeks will test positive in random mandatory drugs testing on at most 18 days out of 28. CONCLUSIONS: Sterilising tablets and hepatitis B vaccination should be offered to all prisoners. Random mandatory drugs testing seriously underestimates injector inmates' harm reduction needs.

Drug injection and HIV prevalence in inmates of Glenochil prison.

OBJECTIVE: To determine prevalence of HIV infection and drug injecting behaviour among inmates of Glenochil Prison on a specified date a year after an outbreak of hepatitis B and HIV infection. DESIGN: Cross sectional: voluntary, anonymous HIV salivary antibody surveillance and linked self completion questionnaire on risk factors. SETTING: Glenochil prison, Scotland, a year after an outbreak of hepatitis B and HIV transmission related to drug injection. SUBJECTS: 352 prisoners, of whom 295 (84%) took part; 284 questionnaires (96%) passed logical checks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HIV prevalence; proportion of all inmates who had ever injected drugs, had ever injected inside prison, had started injecting drugs while inside prison. RESULTS: More than half (150/284) the current inmates were also in Glenochil Prison during the critical period of January to June 1993, when hepatitis B and HIV were transmitted. Similar proportions of current inmates and men who were also in Glenochil during the critical period were drug users (27% (75/278) v 30% (44/149)). A quarter of injecting drug users (18/72) had first injected inside prison, irrespective of whether they were in Glenochil in January to June 1993 and regardless of the calendar period when they first injected. Significantly more inmates from Glasgow (41%; 56/138) than from Edinburgh (21%; 7/34) or elsewhere (11%; 12/106) were injecting drug users. On testing for HIV, seven saliva samples out of 293 gave positive results--four were presumed to be from inmates known to be infected with HIV, and the others from injecting drug users from Glasgow, all of whom had been in Glenochil during January to June 1993, when two of the three had injected drugs and had been tested for HIV, with negative results. The ratio of overall (2.4%) to disclosed (1.4%) HIV prevalence was 1.7. For men who had injected drugs in Glenochil during January to June 1993, HIV prevalence was estimated at 29%. CONCLUSION: Between a quarter and a third of prisoners who injected drugs in Glenochil in January to June 1993 were infected with HIV. There is widespread ongoing risk of bloodborne virus infection within prisons, which is probably long standing but demands urgent attention.

Haemodialysis-induced activation of complement. Effects of different membranes.

The ability of cellulose-based (Cuprophan, saponified cellulose ester) and synthetic (polyacrylonitrile, polycarbonate, polymethylmethacrylate) haemodialysis membranes to activate complement during treatment was compared, using functional, immunochemical, radioimmunoassays, and fast centrifugal analysis assay techniques. Cellulosic and synthetic membranes show a striking similarity in their complement activation when measured by immunochemical assays. Functional haemolytic assays for alternate pathway and CH50 demonstrate no significant differences from predialysis values. C3d levels were also unable to demonstrate differences between the membranes. C3a levels, on the other hand, demonstrated significant differences between cuprophan, polyacrylonitrile, and polymethylmethacrylate but not between Cuprophan and polycarbonate membranes. Since comparable alternate-pathway activity of both cellulosic and synthetic membranes was demonstrated, but their C3a release differed, it is possible that certain surfaces that activate complement also possess the ability to absorb components of the alternate pathway.