Comparison of a custom-made and a thermoplastic oral appliance for the treatment of mild sleep apnea.

RATIONALE: The efficacy of immediate adaptation of mandibular advancement devices made of thermoplastic material as a treatment option for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) has been demonstrated in clinical studies. To date, there have been no studies comparing the efficacy of such prefabricated devices with custom-made devices. OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to compare the efficacy of both types of devices in patients with SDB. METHODS: A randomized controlled cross-over trial, comprising 4 months of treatment with a thermoplastic and a custom-made device, with a 1-month washout interval. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 35 patients (29 males; age, 49 +/- 9 yr; apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], 13 +/- 11 events/h; body mass index, 28 +/- 4 kg/m(2)) completed the protocol. AHI was only reduced with the custom-made device (P = 0.005). In addition, this device reduced snoring to a greater extent than the thermoplastic device. The success rate was higher with the custom-made device (60 vs. 31%; P = 0.02). One-third of the patients demonstrated compliance failure with the thermoplastic device, mainly because of insufficient overnight retention. Total failure rate with the thermoplastic device was 69%, whereas the majority (63%) of these were successfully treated with the custom-made device. At the end of the study, 82% of the patients preferred the custom-made device, and 9% had no preference (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a custom-made device turned out to be more effective than a thermoplastic device in the treatment of SDB. Our results suggest that the thermoplastic device cannot be recommended as a therapeutic option nor can it be used as a screening tool to find good candidates for mandibular advancement therapy.

Pilot study of a novel mandibular advancement device for the control of snoring.

OBJECTIVE: Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) have been introduced as a conservative, non-invasive treatment for socially disturbing snoring and mild obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A prospective, non-randomized pilot study was conducted to investigate the efficacy, feasibility, side-effects and compliance of Somnoguard, an immediately intraorally adaptable MAD made from thermoplastic material. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive heavy snorers with a respiratory disturbance index of <20 events/h were prospectively selected. Prior to the adaptation of the appliance, ambulatory polygraphy was carried out without a MAD. After a 1-month habituation period, a polygraphic evaluation was carried out with the device. Treatment success was defined as a reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of at least 50%. RESULTS: The results indicated a success rate of 65%. The AHI decreased from 8.4 +/- 2.9 events/h at baseline to 3.9 +/- 1.8 events/h with the device (p = 0.001). At 1-month follow-up, significant reductions in the snoring index (p < 0.001) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score (p = 0.036) were noted. At 6-month follow-up, similar results were achieved, with significant drops in the snoring index (p = 0.025) and ESS score (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: We conclude that immediate intraoral adaptation of a low-cost fabricated "one-size-only" MAD is a feasible and well-tolerated treatment for snoring and mild OSA. Further research is needed to evaluate this thermoplastic appliance as a strategy to "screen" the efficacy of MAD treatment in the individual patient with a less expensive appliance before constructing a more expensive custom-made MAD.

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy in sleep-disordered breathing: report on 1,249 cases.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To describe upper airway (UA) collapse patterns during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) in a large cohort of patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and to assess associations with anthropometric and polysomnographic parameters. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: A total of 1,249 patients [age 47 ± 10 y; apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 18.9 ± 15.3/h; body mass index (BMI) 27.2 ± 3.7 kg/m(2)] underwent polysomnography and DISE. DISE findings were categorized to the following UA levels: palate, oropharynx, tongue base, and hypopharynx. The degree of collapse was reported as complete, partial, or none. The pattern of the obstruction was described as anteroposterior, lateral, or concentric. Associations between DISE findings and anthropometric and polysomnographic parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: Palatal collapse was seen most frequently (81%). Multilevel collapse was noted in 68.2% of all patients. The most frequently observed multilevel collapse pattern was a combination of palatal and tongue base collapse (25.5%). Palatal collapse was seen most frequently (81%). The prevalence of complete collapse, multilevel collapse, and hypopharyngeal collapse increased with increasing severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Multilevel and complete collapse were more prevalent in obese patients and in those with more severe OSA. Both higher BMI and AHI values were associated with a higher probability of complete concentric palatal collapse. CONCLUSION: The current study provides an overview of UA collapse patterns in a large cohort of SDB patients who underwent DISE. The associations found in this study may indicate that UA collapse patterns observed during DISE cannot be fully explained by selected baseline polysomnographic and anthropometric characteristics.