The predictive ability of occipital to C3 angle for dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion in patients with combined C2-3 Klippel-Feil syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Improper occipitocervical alignment after occipitocervical fusion (OCF) may lead to devastating complications, such as dysphagia and/or dyspnea. The occipital to C2 angle (O-C2a), occipital and external acoustic meatus to axis angle (O-EAa) have been used to evaluate occipitospinal alignment. However, it may be difficult to identify the inferior endplate of the C2 vertebra in patients with C2-3 Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS). The purpose of this study aimed to compare four different parameters for predicting dysphagia after OCF in patients with C2-3 KFS. METHODS: There were 40 patients with C2-3 KFS undergoing OCF between 2010 and 2019. Radiographs of these patients were collected to measure the occipital to C3 angle (O-C3a), O-C2a, occipito-odontoid angle (O-Da), occipital to axial angle (Oc-Axa), and narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS). The presence of dysphagia was defined as the patient complaining of difficulty or excess endeavor to swallow. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had postoperative dysphagia. We evaluated the relationship between each of the angle parameters and nPAS and analyzed their influence to the postoperative dysphagia. RESULTS: The incidence of dysphagia after OCF was 25% in patients with C2-3 KFS. The Oc-Axa, and nPAS were smaller in the dysphagia group compared to non-dysphagia group at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that dO-C3a had the highest accuracy as a predictor of the dysphagia with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.868. The differences in O-C3a, O-C2a, O-Da, and Oc-Axa were all linearly correlated with nPAS scores preoperatively and at the final follow-up within C2-3 KFS patients, while there was a higher R2 value between the dO-C3a and dnPAS. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the difference of O-C3a was the only significant predictor for dnPAS (ß = 0.670, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The change of O-C3a (dO-C3a) is the most reliable indicator for evaluating occipitocervical alignment and predicting postoperative dysphagia in C2-3 KFS patients. Moreover, dO-C3a should be more than - 2° during OCF to reduce the occurrence of postoperative dysphagia.

[Research on effectiveness of occipito-odontoid angle in predicting dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion in patients with C 2, 3 Klippel-Feil syndrome].

Objective: To introduce a new occipitocervical angle parameter, occipito-odontoid angle (O-Da), for predicting dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion (OCF) in patients with C 2, 3 Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) and analyze its effectiveness. Methods: A total of 119 patients met selective criteria between April 2010 and November 2019 were retrospectively included as the study subjects. There were 56 males and 63 females. The age ranged from 14 to 76 years, with a median age of 51 years. There were 44 cases of basilar invagination and 75 cases of atlantoaxial subluxation. Forty patients were combined with C 2, 3 KFS. Seven patients underwent anterior decompression combined with posterior OCF and 112 patients underwent posterior OCF. The fixed segments were O-C 2 in 36 cases, O-C 3 in 51 cases, O-C 4 in 25 cases, and O-C 5 in 7 cases. All patients were followed up 21-136 months, with a median time of 79 months. The lateral cervical X-ray films before operation and at last follow-up were used to measure the occipital to C 2 angle (O-C 2a), the occipital and external acoustic meatus to axis angle (O-EAa), the occipital protuberance to axial angle (Oc-Axa), the O-Da, and the narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS). The differences of the above parameters between the last follow-up and the preoperative values were calculated (represented as dO-C 2a, dO-EAa, dOc-Axa, dO-Da, and dnPAS). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they suffered dysphagia after operation, and the differences in clinical data and radiographic parameters were compared between the two groups. The correlation between occipitocervical angle parameters and nPAS in 40 patients with C 2, 3 KFS was analyzed respectively. In addition, sensitivity and specificity analyses were used to assess the effectiveness of dO-Da≤-5° for the prediction of postoperative dysphagia. Results: Thirty-one patients (26.1%) suffered dysphagia after OCF (dysphagia group), including 10 patients with C 2, 3 KFS; no dysphagia occurred in 88 patients (non-dysphagia group). There was no significant difference in age, follow-up time, fixed segment, proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, proportion of patients with atlantoaxial subluxation, and proportion of patients with C 2, 3 KFS between the two groups ( P>0.05). The proportion of female patients was significantly higher in dysphagia group than in non-dysphagia group ( χ 2=7.600, P=0.006). The difference in preoperative O-C 2a between the two groups was significant ( t=2.528, P=0.014). No significant differences were observed in preoperative O-EAa, Oc-Axa, O-Da, and nPAS ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in dO-C 2a, dO-EAa, dOc-Axa, dO-Da, and dnPAS between the two groups ( P>0.05). The dO-C 2a, dO-EAa, dOc-Axa, and dO-Da were positively correlated with dnPAS in 40 patients with C 2, 3 KFS ( r=0.604, P<0.001; r=0.649, P<0.001; r=0.615, P<0.001; r=0.672, P<0.001). Taking dO-Da≤-5° as the standard, the sensitivity and specificity of dO-Da to predict postoperative dysphagia in patients with C 2, 3 KFS were 80.0% (8/10) and 93.3% (28/30), respectively. Conclusion: The dO-Da is a reliable indicator for predicting dysphagia after OCF in patients with C 2, 3 KFS.