Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 25(6): 3905-3918, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33415377

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hard tissue volumetric and soft tissue contour linear changes in implants with two different implant surface characteristics after a ligature-induced peri-implantitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In eight beagle dogs, implants with the same size and diameter but distinct surface characteristics were placed in the healed mandibular sites. Test implants had an external monolayer of multi-phosphonate molecules (B+), while control implants were identical but without the phosphonate-rich surface. Once the implants were osseointegrated, oral hygiene was interrupted and peri-implantitis was induced by placing subgingival ligatures. After 16 weeks, the ligatures were removed and peri-implantitis progressed spontaneously. Bone to implant contact (BIC) and bone loss (BL) were assessed three-dimensionally with Micro-Ct (µCT). Dental casts were optically scanned and the obtained digitalized standard tessellation language (STL) images were used to assess the soft tissue vertical and horizontal contour linear changes. RESULTS: Reduction of the three-dimensional BIC percentage during the induction and progression phases of the experimental peri-implantitis was similar for both the experimental and control implants, without statistically significant differences between them. Soft tissue analysis revealed for both implant groups an increase in horizontal dimension after the induction of peri-implantitis, followed by a decrease after the spontaneous progression period. In the vertical dimension, a soft tissue dehiscence was observed in both groups, being more pronounced at the buccal aspect. CONCLUSIONS: The added phosphonate-rich surface did not provide a more resistant environment against experimental peri-implantitis, when assessed by the changes in bone volume and soft tissue contours. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ligature-induced peri-implantitis is a validated model to study the tissue changes occurring during peri-implantitis. It was hypothesized that a stronger osseointegration mediated by the chemical bond of a phosphonate-rich implant surface would develop an environment more resistant to the inflammatory changes occurring after experimental peri-implantitis. These results, however, indicate that the hard and soft tissue destructive changes occurring at both the induction and progression phases of experimental peri-implantitis were not influenced by the quality of osseointegration.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar , Implantes Dentales , Periimplantitis , Animales , Perros , Mandíbula , Oseointegración
2.
Clin Oral Investig ; 25(6): 3789-3800, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33409690

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this experimental in vivo investigation was to evaluate the influence of modifying the implant surface by adding a monolayer of multi-phosphonate molecules on the development of experimental peri-implantitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight beagle dogs received 5 tests and 5 control implants each following a split-mouth design 3 months after premolar and molar extraction. On the most mesial implant of each side, a 3-mm buccal dehiscence was artificially created. Experimental peri-implantitis was induced by silk ligatures over a 4-month period; after ligature removal, peri-implantitis was left to progress for another 4 months without plaque control. Clinical, histological, and radiographic outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Radiographically, both implant groups showed a similar bone loss (BL) at the end of the induction and progression phases. BL measured on the histological sections of the test and control groups was 3.14 ± 0.42 mm and 3.26 ± 0.28 mm, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The remaining buccal bone to implant contact (bBIC) percentage of the test and control groups was 59.38 ± 18.62 and 47.44 ± 20.46%, respectively; the difference, however, was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Bone loss observed at dehiscent sites compared to non-dehiscent ones showed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of a monophosphonate layer to a moderately rough implant surface did not affect development of experimental peri-implantitis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Influence of implant surface on peri-implantitis may condition implant selection by the clinician, especially on patients with disease risk factors. In that sense, monophosphate layer implants do not show higher peri-implantitis risk than control implants.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar , Implantes Dentales , Organofosfonatos , Periimplantitis , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Animales , Implantes Dentales/efectos adversos , Diseño de Prótesis Dental , Perros , Humanos , Propiedades de Superficie , Titanio
3.
Clin Oral Investig ; 24(7): 2351-2361, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31707629

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in alveolar contour after guided bone regeneration (GBR) with two different combinations of biomaterials in dehiscence defects around implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Chronic alveolar ridge defects were created bilaterally in the mandible of eight Beagle dogs. Once implants were placed, three treatment groups were randomly allocated to each peri-implant dehiscence defect: (i) test group received a bone substitute composed of hydroxyapatite (HA) and ß-tricalcium phosphate (ß-TCP) covered by a cross-linked collagen membrane, (ii) positive control group with placement of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) plus a porcine natural collagen membrane, and (iii) a negative control with no treatment. Two healing periods (8 and 16 weeks) were evaluated. Dental casts were optically scanned, the obtained files were uploaded into an image analysis software and superimposed to evaluate the linear changes. RESULTS: In both healing periods, the gains in linear contours were higher in the test group and at the intermediate level (3 mm below the gingival margin). While at 8 weeks, no significant differences were found between the groups; at 16 weeks, the test and positive control groups demonstrated significant gains in contour compared with negative control. CONCLUSIONS: GBR using different biomaterials significantly increased the buccal contours of the alveolar crest when used at dehiscence defects around dental implants. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Particulate highly porous synthetic bone substitute and a cross-linked collagen membrane demonstrated similar outcomes in terms of contour augmentation when compared to bovine xenograft (DBBM) and a collagen membrane.


Asunto(s)
Aumento de la Cresta Alveolar , Regeneración Ósea , Sustitutos de Huesos , Implantes Dentales , Regeneración Tisular Guiada Periodontal , Proceso Alveolar/cirugía , Animales , Sustitutos de Huesos/farmacología , Bovinos , Implantación Dental Endoósea , Perros , Mandíbula/cirugía , Distribución Aleatoria , Porcinos
4.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res ; 2(3): 152-8, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11359260

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Implant restorations first started with total edentulism. Later, the scientific community gave its approval for restorations in partial edentulism, and only recently some studies confirmed the validity of the treatment for single-tooth replacement. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate implant survival and prosthesis stability of Brånemark implants (titanium screws) when used routinely for single-tooth replacement in all regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and fourteen patients received 252 implants for single-tooth replacement over a period of 8 years at five private clinics in Italy. The patients were treated in accordance with the protocol for Brånemark implants, and the data gathered have been analyzed according to established evaluation methods. RESULTS: During the observation period, 10 failures were recorded and 229 restorations were carried out. After the first year of loading, the total cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 96%, which then remained stable over the study time. The most frequent complication was loosening of the abutment screws (n = 22), amounting to 35% of all of the complications. This problem was related mainly to earlier types of abutments, whereas the more recent design, CeraOne abutment, showed a low frequency of screw loosening. CONCLUSIONS: The high survival rate, which is similar to that presented for prospective multicenter studies for single-tooth restorations with Brånemark implants, led to the conclusion that the use of this treatment modality is a reliable treatment for routine use in all oral regions.


Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales de Diente Único/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Odontología/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Pilares Dentales , Diseño de Prótesis Dental , Fracaso de la Restauración Dental , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA