The impact of graft remodeling on peri-implant bone support at implants placed concomitantly with transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A multicenter, retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact on peri-implant bone support (as assessed on periapical radiographs) of the remodeling dynamics of varying graft biomaterials used for transcrestal sinus floor elevation (tSFE). METHODS: The study is a multicenter, retrospective series of cases undergone tSFE (performed according to the Smart Lift technique) and concomitant implant placement. At operator's discretion, tSFE was performed with bone core (BC) alone or supplemented by deproteinized bovine or porcine bone mineral (DBBM and DPBM, respectively), synthetic hydroxyapatite in a collagen matrix (S-HA), or ß-tricalcium phosphate (ß-TCP). Immediately after surgery, at 6-12 months post-surgery, and at later (≥24 months) follow-up intervals, the percentage proportion of the implant surface in direct contact with the radiopaque area was calculated for the entire implant surface (totCON%). Also, the height of the graft apical to the implant apex (aGH) was assessed. RESULTS: At 6-12 months following tSFE, median totCON% was 100%, with a median aGH of 1.4 mm. A tendency of aGH to decrease in height was observed at later follow-up intervals for sites treated with all grafting procedures. In all treatment groups, the majority of the implant surface was still surrounded by the radiopaque area at the longest follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS: Although the height of the peri-implant radiopaque area apical to the implant apex tends to reduce overtime at sites which have received tSFE, the peri-implant bone support seems to be maintained long term irrespective of the graft material used.

Minimally invasive transcrestal sinus floor elevation with deproteinized bovine bone or ß-tricalcium phosphate: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

AIMS: To evaluate the outcomes of transcrestal sinus floor elevation (tSFE) performed with a minimally invasive procedure (Smart Lift technique) combined with the additional use of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) or ß-tricalcium phosphate (ß-TCP). METHODS: In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, 38 sites in 38 patients were treated with the Smart Lift technique in association with DBBM (n = 19) or ß-TCP (n = 19). The extent of the sinus lift (SL) and the height of the graft apical to the implant apex (aGH) were assessed on periapical radiographs taken immediately after surgery and at 6 months following surgery. RESULTS: (i) Substantial aGH and SL were observed immediately after surgery and at 6 months, with no significant differences between DBBM and ß-TCP groups; (ii) a significant graft remodelling was observed from post-surgery to 6-months in the ß-TCP group and (iii) limited incidence of complications as well as limited post-operative pain and discomfort were associated with the use of both graft materials. CONCLUSIONS: The Smart Lift technique in conjunction with the additional use of either DBBM or ß-TCP may provide a substantial elevation of the maxillary sinus floor along with limited post-surgical complications and post-operative pain/discomfort.

Radiographic outcomes of transcrestal sinus floor elevation performed with a minimally invasive technique in smoker and non-smoker patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between smoking status and the outcomes of transcrestal sinus floor elevation (tSFE) performed with a minimally invasive technique (Smart Lift). METHODS: Forty-five implants were placed in 25 non-smoker (NS) and 20 smoker (S) patients in conjunction with the tSFE procedure. In all cases, an additional graft, chosen among different hydroxyapatite-based or ß-tricalcium phosphate-based biomaterials, was pushed into the sinus by gradual increments. Immediately after surgery, residual bone height, implant penetration into the sinus, extent of sinus lift (SL) and the height of the graft apical to the implant apex (aGH) were assessed on periapical radiographs. At 6 months after surgery, SL and aGH were reassessed. RESULTS: (i) The Smart Lift procedure resulted in substantial 6-month SL and aGH in both treatment groups; (ii) smoking status did not significantly affect the 6-month radiographic outcomes; (iii) a similarly low incidence of intra- and postoperative complications was observed in NS and S patients. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking has a limited impact on the outcomes of tSFE performed with the Smart Lift technique.

Early loading of sandblasted, acid-etched implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year follow-up report from a multicenter 3-year prospective study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the concept of an immediate loading protocol in the posterior maxilla and mandible through analysis of implant survival at 1 year. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One year follow-up data of a multicenter study are reported. Eighty-two ITI sandblasted, acid-etched (SLA) implants in 40 patients were loaded between 0 and 11 days after implant placement (mean 4.3 +/- 2.8 days). The restorations consisted of either 2 splinted crowns or a 3-unit fixed prosthesis. All restorations were put into full functional occlusion. Periapical radiographs were evaluated for changes in crestal bone level from baseline to 1 year postloading. Primary stability of the implants was checked initially and before the fitting of the definitive prosthesis. The restorations were evaluated by the practitioners for retention, stability, and esthetics. RESULTS: Three patients' implants were not loaded because of lack of primary stability, and a fourth patient was excluded from the study because of a protocol violation (more than 4 implants were used). All 4 patients were successfully treated outside the protocol. The overall survival rate of the remaining implants at 1 year was 98.8%. The mean bone loss at 1 year was 0.52 +/- 0.98 mm, which is within the reported limits of less than 1 mm (range 0.4 to 1.4 mm) loss in the first year. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The early results from this study indicate that early and immediate loading of 2 implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible may be suitable in selected patients. On the basis of 1 year of observation, the results appear similar to those achieved with a delayed procedure.

Marginal bone preservation in single-tooth replacement: a 5-year prospective clinical multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Few long-term studies are available comparing immediate and conventional loading protocols of implant-supported single-tooth replacement. PURPOSE: The aim of the present randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate prospectively the 5-year clinical and radiological outcome of immediate functional loading implants used in single-tooth replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-one subjects, who required single-tooth rehabilitation in the area from position 15 to 25 and from 35 to 45, were enrolled in eight private clinics in Italy. A randomization protocol was applied to allocate the implants in three treatment groups: one control group and two test groups. In the control group, implant placement was performed according to a conventional drilling procedure, and the implants were submerged for 3 months before abutment connection and loading. Implants allocated in the test group 1 and 2 followed an immediate functional loading protocol. While in test group 1, implant placement was performed according to conventional drilling procedure, in test group 2, a modified implant installation procedure (osteotome technique) was applied. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed during the 5-year follow-up, and technical and biological complications were registered. RESULTS: Although four implants (three in the test group 2 and one in the test group 1) were lost in the immediate functional loading groups in the first year of follow-up, no further implant loss occurred in any of the treatment groups in the following monitoring period up to 5 years. No significant differences on marginal bone level changes were observed between the treatment groups. About 52% of all implants showed bone gain in the period from 1-year to 5-year follow-up. The percentage of all implants that in the same interval of time showed bone loss was about 28%. Although few technical complications were recorded in the period of time up to 5 years, implants showing biological complication were 5.7%. CONCLUSION: It is suggested that implants installed with a conventional installation technique together with an immediate functional loading protocol may be considered as a valid treatment alternative in a long-term perspective when used in a single-tooth replacement in an esthetic area.