Dimensions of central incisors, canines, and first molars in subjects with Down syndrome measured on cone-beam computed tomographs.

INTRODUCTION: The literature on tooth dimensions in subjects with Down syndrome (DS) is scarce. To our knowledge, no studies have yet been published in which the morphometry of the teeth in DS subjects has been determined using computed tomography. METHODS: The study group consisted of 40 subjects with DS, aged 10 to 40 years. An age- and sex-matched control group was selected. Cone-beam computed tomography images were retrieved from the archive of the Santiago de Compostela University in Spain. The maxillary central incisors, canines, and first molars were evaluated. The following variables were analyzed: overall tooth length, crown height, root length, mesiodistal diameter, vestibular-palatine diameter, crown-to-root ratio, and cervical circumference. RESULTS: The teeth of subjects with DS were smaller than those of the controls, although the crown-to-root ratio was maintained. No clear sexual dimorphism was detected, but the root lengths of the incisors were greater in male subjects. Crown height, mesiodistal diameter, and crown-to-root ratio showed progressive reductions with age. There appeared to be a degree of "fluctuating dental asymmetry" with respect to vestibular-palatine diameter and cervical circumference. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm microdontia of the permanent teeth and progressive reductions in tooth sizes with age in persons with DS. These variations might be relevant to orthodontic treatment planning.

Orthodontic treatment for disabled children: a survey of parents' attitudes and overall satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with disability require orthodontic treatment (OT) to achieve adequate oral function and aesthetic appearance. The cooperation of disabled patients and of their parents is central to the success of OT, as treatment can involve ethical dilemmas. The aim of this study was to analyze the motivation, expectations and overall satisfaction with OT among parents of patients with disabilities. METHODS: The parents of 60 disabled Spanish children with physical, mental and/or sensory impairment undergoing OT were surveyed on attitudes to OT and level of satisfaction with the outcomes. The survey consisted of 23 questions in 4 sections: attitude and adaptation, benefits, adverse effects, and level of satisfaction after completion of OT. A control group formed of the parents of 60 healthy children undergoing OT at the same institution were also surveyed. RESULTS: Parents of disabled children undergoing OT showed a high level of motivation and they are willing to collaborate in oral hygiene procedures. Adaptation to the removable appliances was poorer in disabled children but adaptation to fixed appliances was excellent. OT can provide a marked improvement in quality of life, social relationships and oral functionality in disabled children. CONCLUSIONS: Among parents of disabled children undergoing OT, the perceived level of overall satisfaction was very high and expectations were often exceeded.

Oral self-injury: an update.

BACKGROUND: Self-inflicted oral injuries of organic origin are particularly common in certain diseases, syndromes, and systemic disorders. In this article, we discuss the characteristics of these oral lesions and their treatment. LITERATURE SEARCH: The authors have reviewed the most relevant literature relating to oral self-injury through a search in textbooks and published articles included in the Medline database for the years 1970-2010, and selected published cases from the last two decades. RESULTS: The majority of the literature on oral self-injury is in the form of case reports. Self-injury is particularly prevalent in patients with Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, a heterogeneous group of neurological disorders, congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis, and mental retardation. It is most common in males in the early years of life, and the sites most frequently involved are the lower lip and the tongue. Therapeutic approaches in these patients have included psychological and pharmacological treatment, intraoral devices, and surgical procedures. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Intraoral devices are the best therapeutic option for self-injury of organic origin, although this approach is not free of complications. The current lack of standardized treatment protocols for oral self-injury means that therapy must be individualized.

The effect of dentist experience on the treatment of individuals with disability under general anesthesia.

AIMS: The aim of the present work was to assess in patients with severe disability operated under general anesthesia whether the progressive acquisition of experience by the dental team affects the type of procedure performed and the duration of operations. METHODS AND RESULTS: A study group of 911 patients who underwent dental treatment under general anesthesia between 1997 and 2014 was conformed. Information was collected from every patient including: dental diagnosis, dental procedures and duration of the operating times. To analyze the impact of the operators' experience, the study period was divided into three 6-year periods. The most prevalent systemic diagnosis was "mental disease and behavior disorders" (42.9%). The most common dental procedures were extractions and fillings. Fewer extractions were performed during the third 6-year period (p = .000). Compared with the other two periods, during the first period fewer composite fillings (p = .000 and p = .000, respectively) and more fissure sealants (p = .001 and p = .023, respectively) were performed. The number of amalgam fillings decreased progressively (p = .000). There was a statistically significant reduction in the mean duration of the operations between the first and third period (p = .002). CONCLUSION: The dental team's experience entailed a significant reduction in the duration of operations.

Fixed multibracket dental therapy has challenges but can be successfully performed in young persons with Down syndrome.

Purpose The objective of this study was to analyze the feasibility of orthodontic treatment with fixed multibracket dental appliances (FMAs) in patients with Down syndrome (DS). Methods The study sample was formed of 25 patients with DS who underwent orthodontic treatment with FMAs. Dental and skeletal characteristics, aspects of FMA treatment, retainer use and recurrences were analyzed. Results were compared with a control group of healthy, age-, sex- and PAR index-matched individuals. Results All the controls underwent a single desensitization session, whereas 2-3 sessions were necessary in 11 patients with DS (p < 0.001). All the controls underwent bimaxillary treatment, compared with 11 patients with DS (p < 0.001). Only 8 patients with DS wore intermaxillary elastics, compared with 19 controls (p = 0.004). Complications were more common in patients with DS than in controls (p = 0.003), due particularly to traumatic ulcers development. There were more failures during the maintenance phase in patients with DS than in controls (p = 0.001). The mean duration of treatment was 37 months in patients with DS and 23 months in controls. More cemented retainers were used in the controls than in patients with DS (p = 0.050). Conclusions It is possible to perform orthodontic treatment with FMAs in patients with DS, although treatment may take longer than usual and the frequency of complications is higher than in controls. Implications for Rehabilitation Certain dental characteristics of Down syndrome (DS) make these children firm candidates for orthodontic intervention. There is little literature available on orthodontic treatment in patients with DS, particularly with regard to the use of fixed appliances. This case-control study shows that it is possible to perform orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in adequately selected patients with DS. However, in patients with DS orthodontic treatment may take longer than usual and the frequency of complications is higher than in the general population.