Combination chemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for advanced or recurrent carcinosarcoma of the uterus: clinical experience of a single institution.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of carboplatin, paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combination in advanced or recurrent of the uterine carcinosarcoma. METHODS: Twenty-nine eligible patients with measurable disease were treated with carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC) 5], paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 25 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for 6-8 cycles. RESULTS: There were 10 complete responses (CRs) (34%) and 8 partial responses (PRs) (28%) for an overall response rate (RR) of 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43-81%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4.1-12.2 months) and the median overall survival (OS) was 16.4 months (95% CI, 14.7-18.0 months). There was no statistically significant difference between histology and response to therapy. Patients with PS of 0 or 1 had a higher RR than those with worst PS. Toxicity was generally mild except for myelotoxicity. Neutropenia grade 3/4 was recorded in 52% of patients and 10% experienced febrile neutropenia. Anemia grade 3 or 4 developed in 27% of patients and thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4 in 31% of patients. Three patients (10%) developed grade 3 sensory neuropathy and only 2 patients (8%) grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesias. No treatment-related deaths were recorded in our series. CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin appears to have activity in advanced, persistent or recurrent endometrial carcinosarcoma with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin alternating with cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide in platinum refractory/resistant, paclitaxel-pretreated, ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: This phase II study conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (LDOX) alternating with cisplatin (CDDP) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) in platinum-resistant/refractory, paclitaxel pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with CDDP-resistant/refractory and paclitaxel pretreated patients were treated with 8 cycles of GEM 800 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 and LDOX 30 mg/m2 day 1, alternating with CDDP 60 mg/m2 and CTX 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Objective responses were observed in 37.5% of patients (4 complete and 11 partial responses) with measurable disease (n=40). CA125 response occurred in 30 (71.4%) of patients with elevated CA125 (n=42). After a median follow-up of 23 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval, CI: 5.2-8.5), while the median overall survival (OS) was 18.2 months (95% CI: 12.7-23.6). A progression-free interval (PFI) of 0-3 months was associated with lower objective responses (10% versus 46.6%, p=0.06). Chemotherapy was well tolerated. The most frequent toxicities were myelosuppression, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, nausea/vomiting, fatigue and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE). Overall 31 (65%) patients received G-CSF and 13 (27%) antibiotics because of neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: This alternating combination chemotherapy is feasible for patients with platinum-resistant EOC and is associated with encouraging outcomes and a favorable toxicity profile.

Gingival bleeding and jaw bone necrosis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib: report of 2 cases with clinical implications.

There is emerging evidence that oral mucositis/stomatitis is a common adverse effect of sunitininb antiangiogenic therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In addition, a case of sunitinib-related jaw osteonecrosis was recently described. We report on 2 patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib. The first patient, a 19-year-old woman, treated with cisplatin and sunitinib, presented with oral pain, malodor, spontaneous and continuous gingival bleeding, and painful necrotic ulcerations clinically resembling necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis (NUG). Suntinib-related stomatitis and bleeding were considered cumulative to NUG symptoms. The second patient, a 64-year-old woman, treated with sunitinib only, complained of mandibular pain. Sunitinib-related jaw osteonecrosis was diagnosed. Gingival bleeding and soft tissue necrosis, as well as jaw osteonecrosis may develop as adverse events of sunitinib use. Antiangiogenic therapies are increasingly used in the treatment of cancers. The presented cases are aimed to alert health care professionals on adverse oral events.