Community pharmacy staff needs for the provision of oral health care education and advice in Australia.

BACKGROUND: In Australia, 61% of pharmacy staff (pharmacists and pharmacy assistants) state that on average they are consulted for oral health care advice 2 or more times each week. International studies recognize the potential to enhance pharmacy staff roles in oral health care, given they are regularly consulted for a variety of oral health issues. OBJECTIVES: This study explored the preparedness of pharmacy staff to provide oral health care education and advice within Australian community pharmacies. The aims of this study were (1) to assess the types of oral health education resources available for pharmacy staff and patients within Australian community pharmacies; (2) determine pharmacy staff awareness of available Australian government-funded dental services or schemes and; (3) explore pharmacy staff views regarding safety of drinking water fluoridation in Australia. METHODS: Pharmacists and pharmacy assistants from a randomly selected national sample of 5700 Australian community pharmacies were invited to complete an online or postal questionnaire. Participants were offered a A$10 incentive to enhance response rates. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used for the analysis. RESULTS: The response rate for the pharmacist cohort was 58.5% (644 of 1100) and 28% (280 of 1000) for pharmacy assistants. More than 80% of pharmacy staff did not have oral health education resources for patients and did not have access to oral health information resources for their own education. Nearly all staff (96%) were unaware of government Child Dental Benefits Schedule (CDBS) and Department of Veterans' Affairs dental funding support. Approximately one-third of pharmacy staff believed that water fluoridation in drinking water supplies was unsafe or were unsure of its safety. CONCLUSIONS: Oral health care training and education resources are needed to support pharmacy staff to deliver improved and responsive oral health care within Australian communities.

Oral examination of fourth-year medical students on surgery rotations allows faculty to assess Core Entrustable Professional Activities for entering Residency (CEPAR): Proof-of-concept and analysis of student submissions.

BACKGROUND: As a community-based medical school which recruited faculty preceptors new to teaching, we sought to create objective assessments for fourth-year surgery experiences via administration of an oral exam. Students provided three authentic cases, which faculty used as a springboard to ascertain student proficiency in five entrustable professional activities: 1-oral presentation, 2-recognition of urgency/instability, 3-calling consults, 4-transitions of care, 5-informed consent. We present proof-of-concept and analysis of student case submissions. METHODS: Twenty-seven student submissions (79 cases in total) were evaluated for case complexity, level-appropriateness, and an estimation of the ability to conduct a quality exam based on the information provided (subjective measures). Objective metrics included word count, instruction adherence, inclusion of figures/captions. A resident-in-training rated cases via the same metrics. In-examination data was separately culled. RESULTS: The average word count was 281.70 (SD 140.23; range 40-743). Figures were included in 26.1% of cases. Faculty raters scored 29.0% as low-complexity, 37.7% medium-complexity, and 33.3% high-complexity. Raters felt 62.3% of cases provided enough information to conduct a quality exam. The majority of cases submitted (65.2%) were level-appropriate or higher. The resident rater scored cases more favorably than surgeons (Cohen's kappa of -0.5), suggesting low inter-rater agreement between those of differing experience levels. CONCLUSION: Student's case submissions lessened faculty burden and provided assessors with adequate information to deliver a quality exam to assess proficiency in clinical skills essential for residency. Cases demonstrated sufficient complexity and level-appropriateness. The request to correlate case rating with exam performance is under review by our institution's assessment office. Near-peer tutoring by resident alumni is a program under development.

Investigating the management of potentially cancerous nonhealing mouth ulcers in Australian community pharmacies.

We sought to examine the management and referral of nonhealing mouth ulcer presentations in Australian community pharmacies in the Greater Brisbane region. Trained simulated patients visited 220 randomly selected community pharmacies within the Greater Brisbane region in 2016. Simulated patients enacted two nonhealing (>1 month) mouth ulcer scenarios: A direct product request (DPR) (n = 110) and a symptom-based request (SBR) (n = 110). Results were documented and evaluated against Australian national pharmacy practice standards. Referral rates for pharmacy staff (pharmacist, pharmacy assistant or mixed-pharmacist and assistant) were also assessed. Australian pharmacy practice standards recommend staff ask six key questions during SBR and DPR consultations to enable informed decision-making. Two questions relating to identifying the patient and their symptoms were asked in the majority of interactions (76% and 69% respectively); the remaining four questions relating to symptom duration, treatments tried, other medications, and medical conditions were enquired in only 32%, 53%, 31%, and 27% of interactions, respectively. Simulated patients were referred to the doctor/dentist in only 11.8% of all interactions (both scenarios requiring referral). Overall, staff handling of nonhealing mouth ulcer consultations was suboptimal compared to national professional standards. In particular, duration of the nonhealing mouth ulcer was enquired in less than one-third of consultations potentially resulting in low referral rates by staff. This study identifies the need for increased oral cancer awareness and education for community pharmacy staff and reinforcing the importance of practising according to professional standards to effectively screen for potentially cancerous nonhealing mouth lesions.

Exploring oral healthcare management across Australian community pharmacies using case vignettes.

OBJECTIVES: In Australia, more than 80% of pharmacists and pharmacy assistants are consulted for oral healthcare advice up to five times or more each week. This study assesses Australian community pharmacy staff's (pharmacists and pharmacy assistants) ability to recognize and manage common oral health presentations using case vignettes, and determine whether appropriate identification and management are associated with self-reported confidence. METHODS: Five oral healthcare case vignettes were developed based on previous literature by a multidisciplinary team of dental and pharmacy practitioner academics. Topics included pulpitis, gingivitis, oral hygiene advice for a toddler, a mouth ulcer and a dry mouth scenario. Pharmacies were randomly selected from each Australian State and Territory and community pharmacy staff invited to complete the case vignettes. RESULTS: A total of 312 and 932 case vignettes were completed by pharmacy assistants and pharmacists, respectively. Approximately one-third of staff appropriately identified a non-healing mouth ulcer and up to 16% recognized a pulpitis (inflamed dental pulp) presentation. Provision of best practice or evidence-based recommendations were reported in up to 28%, 19%, 57% and 31% of pharmacy staff offering appropriate advice and guidance for pulpitis, gingivitis, a non-healing mouth ulcer and oral health promotion messages, respectively. No participants provided all best practice recommendations for drug-induced xerostomia. In all five vignettes, confidence was not associated with best practice recommendations and was only modestly associated with improved rates for recognizing gingivitis symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: To allow community pharmacists and assistants to fulfil their role as important members of the oral healthcare team, additional training and support are required to facilitate improved recognition of common oral health presentations and to offer recommendations which are in line with current best practice guidelines.

Treatment effects of the bionator and high-pull facebow combination followed by fixed appliances in patients with increased vertical dimensions.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a first phase of bionator and high-pull facebow treatment followed by a second phase of fixed appliance therapy in growing subjects with increased vertical dimensions. METHODS: The records of 24 subjects with high-angle skeletal relationships (mean MPA value approximately 30 degrees) treated consecutively with this protocol were examined. Cephalometric measurements were compared with those obtained from 23 sets of records of an untreated group matched according to age, gender, vertical skeletal relationships, and time intervals between records. The matched group of patients was from the University of Michigan Elementary and Secondary School Growth Study. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed prior to the start of treatment (T1, mean age 9.1 years), at the start of phase 2 treatment (T2, mean age 11.9 years), and after phase 2 treatment (T3, mean age 14.7 years). The total treatment duration (phase 1, retention, and phase 2) for the treated group was 5.5 years, whereas the control group total time interval averaged 5.6 years. RESULTS: As to sagittal relationships, no significant differences were found between treated subjects and controls at the end of the 2-phase treatment for all measurements. Counterintuitively, the bionator and high-pull headgear combination worsened the hyperdivergent facial pattern at a clinically significant level, as shown by analysis of final facial forms. The treated group exhibited a significantly larger MPA value than controls (2.5 degrees) as well as a larger inclination of the Frankfort horizontal to the occlusal plane (2.8 degrees ). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the analysis of this sample, the examined therapeutic protocol does not appear to be a recommendable option for treatment of subjects with increased vertical dimensions.

A national survey exploring oral healthcare service provision across Australian community pharmacies.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated pharmacists' and pharmacy assistants' current practices and perspectives with regard to oral healthcare provision across Australian community pharmacies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. A questionnaire for each pharmacist and pharmacy assistant cohort was developed and administered by online or postal means. Pearson's χ2 test was used to examine relationships between categorical variables. PARTICIPANTS: Pharmacists and pharmacy assistants working within 2100 randomly selected Australian community pharmacies. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 58.5% (644/1100) for the pharmacist cohort and 28% (280/1000) for the pharmacy assistant cohort. This represents pharmacy staff responses from 803 community pharmacies across Australia (approximately 14.6%, 803/5500 of community pharmacies nationally). Overall, the majority of pharmacists (80.2%; 516/644) and pharmacy assistants (83.6%; 234/280) reported providing oral health advice/consultations to health consumers up to five times each week. More than half of community pharmacists and pharmacy assistants were involved in identifying signs and symptoms for oral health problems; and the majority believed health consumers were receptive to receiving oral health advice. Additionally, more than 80% of pharmacists and 60% of pharmacy assistants viewed extended oral healthcare roles positively and supported integrating them within their workplace; extended roles include provision of prevention, early intervention and referral to oral healthcare services. The most commonly reported barriers to enhance pharmacy staff involvement in oral healthcare within Australian community pharmacies include lack of knowledge, ongoing training and resources to assist practice. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that Australian pharmacists have an important role in oral health and provides evidence supporting the need for growing partnerships/collaborations between pharmacy and dental healthcare professionals and organisations to develop, implement and evaluate evidence-based resources, interventions and services to deliver improved and responsive oral healthcare within Australian communities.

Describing the role of Australian community pharmacists in oral healthcare.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate community pharmacist's attitudes, beliefs and practices towards oral health in the Australian setting, describe the frequency and nature of consumer enquiries relating to oral health, and gain insight regarding smoking cessation support for people experiencing oral health problems. METHODS: An online questionnaire was developed based on previous research, validated to ensure accuracy and reliability, and convenience sampling used to advertise across major pharmacy organisational websites and newsletters to maximise community pharmacist responses. KEY FINDINGS: One hundred and forty-four valid community pharmacist responses were descriptively analysed. The majority of pharmacists (93%) believed it was their role to deliver oral health advice in the community and almost all (97%) pharmacists believed further education would benefit their practice. The top four consumer enquiries pharmacists reported confidence in handling related to analgesic medication to relieve oral-related pain (95.8%), mouth ulcers (95.1%), oral thrush (94.4%) and toothache (93.8%); and the most frequently reported consumer enquires were those where the majority of pharmacists reported high confidence in handling. A small proportion of pharmacists (8%) always enquired about patient smoking status, and nearly all pharmacists (97%) desired further education and training to benefit their practice in oral healthcare. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that Australian pharmacists have an important role in oral health and there is opportunity to enhance this role, and address risk factors such as smoking with further training, support and education. The findings from this study can guide future research into the development of appropriate training programmes, standards, and best oral healthcare practices for Australian pharmacists.