Impact of Oral Cavity Dosimetry on Patient Reported Xerostomia and Dysgeusia in the Setting of Deintensified Chemoradiotherapy.

Purpose: To determine the relationship between mean oral cavity (OC) dose (treated as a singular organ at risk) to patient reported xerostomia and dysgeusia. In addition, we will examine the relationship between oral cavity substructure doses to patient reported xerostomia and dysgeusia. All patients were treated in the setting of deintensification (60 Gy). Methods and Materials: In the study, 184 and 177 prospectively enrolled patients for de-escalated chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer submitted PROs at 6 and 12 months, respectively using Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events questionnaire. Patient's OC consisting of the following substructures were segmented: oral tongue, base of tongue, floor of mouth, hard and soft palate, cheek mucosa, and upper and lower lip mucosa. Ordinal logistic regression (no/mild vs moderate vs severe/very severe symptoms) was used to compare organs at risk dosimetry to patient reported xerostomia and dysgeusia at 6 and 12 months. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression models were generated. Results: Mean dose to the contralateral parotid (P = .04), OC (P = .04), and baseline patient reported xerostomia (P = .009) were significantly associated with xerostomia severity at 6 months. Only baseline xerostomia (P = .02) and mean dose to the contralateral submandibular gland (P = .0001) were significantly associated with xerostomia severity at 12 months. The only significant factor related to dysgeusia at either time point was mean dose to the OC at 12 months (P = .009). On examining substructures, the mean dose to the floor of mouth was implicated for the dose relationship to 6-month xerostomia (P = .04), and the oral tongue was found to be implicated for the relationship for 12-month dysgeusia (P = .04). Conclusions: The mean dose to the OC was found to relate to xerostomia symptoms at 6 months post-CRT and dysgeusia symptoms at 12 months post-CRT. The mean dose to the floor of mouth and oral tongue appeared to drive this relationship for xerostomia and dysgeusia symptoms, respectively. This work suggests the floor of mouth and oral tongue should be prioritized during planning over the rest of the OC. The effect of OC dose relative to other salivary structures for xerostomia appeared to depend on time post-CRT.

Clinical Use of A Priori Knowledge of Organ-At-Risk Sparing During Radiation Therapy Treatment for Oropharyngeal Cancer: Dosimetric and Patient Reported Outcome Improvements.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to prospectively assess dosimetric and clinical effects of treatment planners having a priori knowledge of the maximum achievable dose sparing for organs at risk (OARs) for patients with oropharynx cancer receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We examined patients with oropharynx cancer who were treated in prospective clinical trials between February 2012 and April 2019 at our institution. A tool generating estimates of maximum achievable dose sparing for OARs (feasibility dose-volume histogram [FDVH]) was used clinically starting July 2016. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: Before (ie, baseline) and after (ie, FDVH-guided) FDVH. Doses received by various OARs were compared with those estimated to be achievable per FDVH, and that difference was defined as the excess of feasible dose (EFD). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires were completed at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The baseline and FDVH-guided cohorts were compared in terms of EFD, plan quality metrics, and post-RT PRO assessments. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients were included in the analysis (60 in the baseline cohort, 79 in the FDVH-guided cohort). The FDVH-guided cohort had lower EFD to the contralateral parotid by 4.1 Gy, the ipsilateral parotid by 10.6 Gy, the larynx by 4.3 Gy, the oral cavity by 1.5 Gy, and the contralateral submandibular gland by 0.4 Gy. Plan quality metrics were similar between the cohorts. Less variation of EFD was seen in the FDVH-guided cohort for the parotid glands and contralateral submandibular gland (P < .05). The average post-RT PROs were better in the FVHD cohort versus baseline (particularly at the 6-month timepoint for dry mouth frequency, sticky saliva, meal enjoyment, severity of pain, and Eating Assessment Tool 10 composite [swallowing]; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Use of FDVH was associated with improved and less variable OAR sparing for clinically delivered plans. FDVH-guided patients had improved PROs compared with baseline with a variety of outcomes significantly improved at 6 months after treatment.

Prospective assessment of sparing the parotid ducts via MRI sialography for reducing patient reported xerostomia.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of prospectively sparing the parotid ducts via MRI sialography on patient reported xerostomia for those receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-eight patients with oropharynx cancer to be treated with definitive RT underwent pre-treatment MRI sialograms to localize their parotid ducts. The parotid ducts were maximally spared during treatment planning. Patients reported symptoms (PRO-CTCAE and QLQ-H&N35) were collected at 6 and 12 months post-RT and compared to a historical cohort who underwent conventional parotid gland mean dose sparing. Regression models were generated using parotid and submandibular gland doses with and without incorporating the dose to the parotid ducts to determine the impact of parotid duct dose on patient reported xerostomia. RESULTS: At 6 months post-RT, 12/26 (46%) patients reported ≥moderate xerostomia when undergoing parotid ductal sparing compared to 43/61 (70%) in the historical cohort (p = 0.03). At 12 months post-RT, 8/22 (36%) patients reported ≥moderate xerostomia when undergoing parotid ductal sparing compared to 34/68(50%) in the historical cohort (p = 0.08). Using nested logistic regression models, the mean parotid duct dose was found to significantly relate to patient reported xerostomia severity at 6 months post-RT (p = 0.04) and trended towards statistical significance at 12 months post-RT (p = 0.09). At both 6 and 12 months post-RT, the addition of mean parotid duct dose significantly improved model fit (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MRI sialography guided parotid duct sparing appears to reduce the rates of patient-reported xerostomia. Further, logistic regression analysis found parotid duct dose to be significantly associated with patient reported xerostomia. A significant improvement in model fit was observed when adding mean parotid duct dose compared to models that only contain mean parotid gland dose and mean contralateral submandibular gland dose.