Successful Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Impact of Timing on Eradication of Infection.

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a serious complication following total knee arthroplasty. In the setting of chronic infections, the two-staged approach has traditionally been the preferred treatment method. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal period of rest between the first and second stage. Furthermore, we analyzed potentially outcome-relevant parameters, such as general and local conditions and the presence of difficult-to-treat or unidentified microorganisms, with regard to their impact on successful treatment of PJI. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for all patients treated for PJI at our institution. Seventy-seven patients who had undergone two-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI of the knee were included into the study. Antibiotic-loaded cement spacers were used for all patients. Results: After a median follow-up time of 24.5 months, infection had reoccurred in 14 (18.7%) patients. A prolonged spacer-retention period of more than 83 days was related to a significantly higher proportion of reinfections. Furthermore, significant compromising local conditions of the prosthetic tissue and surrounding skin, as well as repeated spacer-exchanges between first- and second-stage surgery, negatively influenced the outcome. Neither the patients' age nor gender exerted a significant influence on the outcome regarding reinfection rates for patients' age or gender. Conclusions: We observed the best outcome regarding infection control in patients who had undergone second-stage surgery within 12 weeks after first-stage surgery. Nearly 90% of these patients stayed free from infection until the final follow-up. An increased number of performed spacer-exchanges and a bad local extremity grade also had a negative impact on the outcome.

Superficial Vancomycin Coating of Bone Cement in Orthopedic Revision Surgery: A Safe Technique to Enhance Local Antibiotic Concentrations.

BACKGROUND: The use of antibiotic-loaded cement has become a well-accepted method to develop high local antibiotic concentrations in revision surgery of infected arthroplasty. A new surgical technique has been established to further increase the local antibiotic concentration and thereby minimizes the risk of reinfection. Our study aim was to investigate the safety of additional superficial vancomycin coating (SVC) by analyzing postoperative joint and serum vancomycin concentrations, as well as the creatinine levels of patients with orthopedic revision surgery. METHODS: A longitudinal case series was performed by reviewing collected data of patients who were treated by SVC during revision surgery (1- or 2-stage exchange) because of prosthetic joint infections. Vancomycin levels were obtained, local from drains and systemic from blood samples, on postoperative days 1 to 5. Furthermore, preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine levels were analyzed. RESULTS: Highest median local vancomycin levels were documented on postoperative day 1 with 546.8 µg/mL (range, 44.4-1485 µg/mL) in the reimplantation group and 408.7 µg/mL (range, 24.7-1650 µg/mL) in the spacer group. Median serum vancomycin level was 4.4 µg/mL (range, <2.0-11.7 µg/mL) on the first postoperative day in the reimplantation group and <2.0 µg/mL (range, <2.0-3.9 µg/mL) in the spacer group, and lower than 2.0 µg/mL (range, <2.0-7.5 µg/mL) from postoperative day 2 to 5 in both groups. Neither an anaphylactic reaction nor other side effects to SVC were observed. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that SVC of bone cement is an effective technique to enhance local concentrations of vancomycin without leading to systemic side effects.

Comparison of elution characteristics and mechanical properties of acrylic bone cements with and without superficial vancomycin coating (SVC) in the late phase of polymerization.

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic-loaded bone cements (ALBCs) are used as spacers in two-stage revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. We previously described a new technique applying vancomycin powder coating to custom-made cements. To our best knowledge, this method of superficial vancomycin coating (SVC) has not been assessed before. We therefore performed an in-vitro study to determine: (1) whether manually applied SVC strengthened the cements' antibiotic effect; and (2) whether the mechanical requirements for the cements were fulfilled. HYPOTHESIS: SVC increases the antibiotic effect of cement within the first 24hours. METHODS: Cuboid blocks were produced from two commercially available acrylic ALBCs (Palacos R+G and Copal G+V) with and without SVC. Each block was eluted in phosphate-buffered saline at 37°C. Eluates obtained at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 30 and 60minutes and 3, 6 and 24hours were evaluated against Staphylococcus aureus (Palacos, Copal) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (Copal) using zone of inhibition tests. Mechanical test results (bending modulus, bending strength) were compared to ISO requirements (≥1800MPa, ≥50MPa). RESULTS: Palacos with SVC produced significantly greater zones of inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus than Palacos without SVC (p=0.002). Copal with SVC showed greater zones of inhibition against both Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA (p=0.002). The antibiotic effect was enhanced by SVC in both cements at every time point within 24hours. The bending modulus and bending strength of Palacos with SVC (2089±166MPa, 60.8±2.6 MPA) and Copal with SVC (2283±195MPa, 56.9±2.4MPa) were significantly above ISO requirements. CONCLUSION: SVC boosts the antibiotic effect of ALBCs in the first 24hours, while maintaining sufficient stability. These findings endorse SVC as a promising additive in septic revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case control study.