[Artifacts from dental metal alloys in magnetic resonance imaging].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the artifact sizes at 3.0 T compared to at 1.5 T caused by three kinds of metallic dental materials, and to evaluate the influences of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences on the artifact. METHODS: Samples of metal-ceramic crown of three kinds of dental materials (Ni-Cr alloy, Co-Cr alloy, and gold alloy) were placed in a cylindrical plastic vessel filled with agarose gel. Acrylic resin crown was used as control. Images were performed by means of 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI apparatus with 4 different sequences commonly used in brain MRI sequences. Artifact diameter was calculated and compared quantitatively. A 4 x 4 x 2 factorial design was applied to determine the effects on the MRI artifact of different metal materials, different sequences, and different magnetic field strengths. RESULTS: ANOVA of factorial design showed that the influences of material, magnetic field strength, and sequence were all significantly different( materials: F = 124.796, df = 3, P = 0.000; magnetic field strength: F = 9.367, df = 1, P = 0.003; sequence: F = 3.020, df = 3, P = 0.036). Among the 3 kinds of alloys, the gold alloy produced the least artifact. Among the 4 imaging sequences, fast spin echo (FSE) produced the least artifact. The artifact sizes increased at 3.0 T compared to at 1.5T. Interactions among the 3 factors did not influence the artifacts significantly (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Selection of specific metal material and imaging sequence can minimize the metal artifacts in MRI. The increment of artifacts at 3.0 T is only by 10% compared to that at 1.5 T. But 3.0 T MRI system has great advantages, so it is eligible on patients with metal restoration.

[An experimental study of the effects of root-canal treatment on orthodontic movement in cat cuspids].

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of orthodontic forces in moving teeth after root canal therapy and the risk of apical resorption which may happen during orthodontic movement in an animal model. METHODS: Under general anesthesia, root canal therapy was performed on the mandibular canines on one side of 16 adult cats. Tipping movement of the canines was induced with an orthodontic spring (100 to 120 g). Eight weeks later, tooth movement was assessed from pre- and posttreatment mandibular casts, including measurement of root lengths in both radiographs and histological sections. All the data were analysed with SPSS 11.0 for windows. Student's t test was used for comparisons between paired groups. RESULTS: The results showed that teeth after root canal therapy and vital teeth moved similar distances when subjected to the same forces (P>0.05). And teeth after root canal therapy had greater loss of cementum after tooth movement than vital teeth (P<0.05), but without significant differences in radiographic root length (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Teeth after root canal therapy can be moved orthodontically as readily as vital teeth when subjected to the same orthodontic forces under the conditions of the study. However, teeth after root canal therapy have more root resorption than vital teeth during orthodontic movement which may not be detected form the radiography.