[Spacer, Aerosol Therapy through Space and Time]. / Spacer, Aerosoltherapie durch Raum und Zeit.

AIM OF THE LITERATURE REVIEW: Within this review, results of a literature analysis on the application of spacers with pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI) are described and evaluated. METHODS: Next to an extensive revision on effects of spacers, the impacts of current guidelines and the conditions for product authorisations on the use of spacers are described which result from the interplay of characteristics from dose inhalers with a spacer. RESULTS: Spacers are generally useful to avoid coordination problems concerning the actuation of a pMDI at the beginning of an inhalation. Furthermore, in comparison to the pMDI application without a spacer a reduced mouth-throat deposition is applicable to all pMDI spacer combinations. However, some new pMDI release the aerosol in a quality that may not necessarily require a spacer to avoid a high drug deposition in the mouth-throat area as the aerosol quality will not be greatly improved with a spacer. The delivered mass of the active ingredient as well as the aerosol quality released from a spacer vary substantially with the use of different spacers. A change of spacer while using the same dose inhaler can maximally result in a doubling or halving of the quantity of the active ingredient applied. These facts are nowadays considered by the European regulatory agency. CONCLUSION: If a spacer application is intended for pMDIs that were developed and approved after 2009, the correspondent SMP (Summary of Product Characteristics) should at least make one specific recommendation for a spacer that should be based upon relevant in vitro data or additional in vivo data. If a different spacer than the recommended one is used, the effectively applied dose cannot be correctly anticipated. This should be considered when choosing a spacer.

[Spacer, Aerosol Therapy through Space and Time]. / Spacer, Aerosoltherapie durch Raum und Zeit.

Aim of the literature review Within this review, results of a literature analysis on the application of spacers with pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI) are described and evaluated. Methods Next to an extensive revision on effects of spacers, the impacts of current guidelines and the conditions for product authorisations on the use of spacers are described which result from the interplay of characteristics from dose inhalers with a spacer. Results Spacers are generally useful to avoid coordination problems concerning the actuation of a pMDI at the beginning of an inhalation. Furthermore, in comparison to the pMDI application without a spacer a reduced mouth-throat deposition is applicable to all pMDI spacer combinations. However, some new pMDI release the aerosol in a quality that may not necessarily require a spacer to avoid a high drug deposition in the mouth-throat area as the aerosol quality will not be greatly improved with a spacer. The delivered mass of the active ingredient as well as the aerosol quality released from a spacer vary substantially with the use of different spacers. A change of spacer while using the same dose inhaler can maximally result in a doubling or halving of the quantity of the active ingredient applied. These facts are nowadays considered by the European regulatory agency. Conclusion If a spacer application is intended for pMDIs that were developed and approved after 2009, the correspondent SMP (Summary of Product Characteristics) should at least make one specific recommendation for a spacer that should be based upon relevant in vitro data or additional in vivo data. If a different spacer than the recommended one is used, the effectively applied dose cannot be correctly anticipated. This should be considered when choosing a spacer.

Peak inspiratory flow rate after methacholine challenge in asthmatic patients and its impact on the effect of formoterol via different inhalers.

The goal of the present study was to investigate the bronchodilating effects of 6 and 12 microg formoterol delivered by the Turbuhaler, in comparison to salbutamol 200 microg (metered dose inhaler) and to controls without treatment. After inducing acute and severe bronchial obstruction by means of methacholine challenge, peak inspiratory mouth flow (PIMF) was measured through a stenosis, simulating the internal resistance of the Turbuhaler, with the in-check device. In addition the relationship was studied between PIMF and clinical response in the 3 treatment groups. In the 176 patients methacholine caused a mean fall in FEV(1) of 37.1 +/- 6.9% compared to baseline. Ten minutes after bronchodilator inhalation, FEV(1) improved significantly in all three treatment groups. At 30 minutes after bronchodilator administration, only the salbutamol 200 microg and the formoterol 12 microg groups had a significantly greater increase in FEV1 than controls (0.69 +/- 0.43 l and 0.66 +/- 0.37 l vs 0.38 +/- 0.32 l, p < 0.0005), whereas the formoterol 6 microg group showed no significant improvement (0.41 +/- 0.38 l, p = 0.74). Thirteen patients (7.4%) did not reach a minimal PIMF of 30 l/min through the in-check device after challenge. In the four patients in the formoterol 6 microg group with a PIMF below 30 l/min inhalation did not cause bronchodilation. In conclusion, the results demonstrate that 6 microg formoterol via Turbuhaler leads to less and slower onset of bronchodilation compared to the other groups in our setting. If patients fail to generate a PIMF of 30 l/min, 6 microg formoterol via Turbuhaler may provide inadequate relief in a severe asthma attack.