Efficacy and safety of PEGylated exenatide injection (PB-119) in treatment-naive type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a Phase II randomised, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) such as exenatide are used as monotherapy and add-on therapy for maintaining glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The current study investigated the safety and efficacy of once-weekly PB-119, a PEGylated exenatide injection, in treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In this Phase II, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, we randomly assigned treatment-naive Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous placebo or one of three subcutaneous doses of PB-119 (75, 150, and 200 µg) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 12, and other endpoints were fasting plasma glucose, 2 h postprandial glucose (PPG), and proportion of patients with HbA1c < 53 mmol/mol (<7.0%) and ≤48 mmol/mol (≤6.5%) at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. RESULTS: We randomly assigned 251 patients to one of the four treatment groups (n = 62 in placebo and 63 each in PB-119 75 µg, 150 µg and 200 µg groups). At the end of 12 weeks, mean differences in HbA1c in the treatment groups were -7.76 mmol/mol (95% CI -9.23, -4.63, p < 0.001) (-0.72%, 95% CI -1.01, -0.43), -12.89 mmol/mol (95% CI -16.05, -9.72, p < 0.001) (-1.18%, 95% CI -1.47, -0.89) and -11.14 mmol/mol (95% CI -14.19, -7.97, p <0 .001) (-1.02%, 95% CI -1.30, -0.73) in the 75 µg, 150 µg and 200 µg PB-119 groups, respectively, compared with that in the placebo group after adjusting for baseline HbA1c. Similar results were also observed for other efficacy endpoints across different time points. There was no incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse event, severe hypoglycaemia or death. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: All tested PB-119 doses had superior efficacy compared with placebo and were safe and well tolerated over 12 weeks in treatment-naive Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03520972 FUNDING: The study was funded by National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for Significant New Drugs Development and PegBio.

Impact of polyethylene glycol loxenatide on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (BALANCE-3).

INTRODUCTION: Recent cardiovascular outcomes trials have demonstrated that glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) decreases the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Polyethylene glycol loxenatide (PEG-Loxe) is a once-weekly GLP-1RA obtained by modifying exendin-4. No clinical trials have been designed to assess the impact of PEG-Loxe on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in individuals with T2DM. This trial aims to test the hypothesis that compared with placebo, PEG-Loxe treatment does not result in an unacceptable increase in CV risk in individuals with T2DM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with T2DM who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly divided to receive weekly administration of either PEG-Loxe 0.2 mg or placebo (1:1 ratio). The randomisation was stratified according to utilisation of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, history of CV disease and body mass index. The research period is expected to be 3 years, with a 1-year recruitment period and a 2-year follow-up period. The primary outcome is the occurrence of the first MACE, described as CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke. The statistical analyses were undertaken on the intent-to-treat patient. The primary outcome was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment and randomisation strata as the covariates. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The current research has been authorised by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University Chu Hsien-I Memorial Hospital (approval number: ZXYJNYYhMEC2022-2). Researchers must acquire informed consent from every participant before conducting any protocol-associated procedures. The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200056410.

[The investigation of the periodontal status of type 2 diabetes mellitus families].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the periodontal status of the family members of type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A total of 167 subjects in 43 families of type 2 diabetes were enrolled in this study (71 male, 96 female; mean age: 49.2). Periodontal index including probing depth (PD), plaque index (PLI), bleeding index (BI), attachment loss (AL) and the numbers of tooth loss were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-seven diabetic patients all have periodontitis, 50 mild, 24 moderate and 23 severe periodontitis. Of 48 non-diabetic patients, there are 5 gingivitis, 30 mild, 11 moderate and 2 severe periodontitis. There is statistically significant difference in the incidence of gingivitis mild moderate and severe periodontitis between diabetic and non-diabetic patients (chi(2) = 17.96, P < 0.05). The periodontal index PD, AL and numbers of tooth loss in diabetes family members were significantly higher than those of non-diabetes family members (P < 0.05). The clinical parameters were not different between well-controlled family member and non-diabetes family member. CONCLUSIONS: Periodontal destruction of diabetes members was more severe than that of non-diabetes members. Diabetes mellitus may be a risk factor for periodontitis.