RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Genetic and ecological factors influence morphology, and morphology is compatible with function. The morphology and bite performance of skulls of bats show a number of characteristic feeding adaptations. The great evening bat, Ia io (Thomas, 1902), eats both insects and birds (Thabah et al. J Mammal 88: 728-735, 2007), and as such, it is considered to represent a case of dietary niche expansion from insects to birds. How the skull morphology or bite force in I. io are related to the expanded diet (that is, birds) remains unknown. We used three-dimensional (3D) geometry of the skulls and measurements of bite force and diets from I. io and 13 other species of sympatric or closely related bat species to investigate the characteristics and the correlation of skull morphology and bite force to diets. RESULTS: Significant differences in skull morphology and bite force among species and diets were observed in this study. Similar to the carnivorous bats, bird-eaters (I. io) differed significantly from insectivorous bats; I. io had a larger skull size, taller crania, wider zygomatic arches, shorter but robust mandibles, and larger bite force than the insectivores. The skull morphology of bats was significantly associated with bite force whether controlling for phylogeny or not, but no significant correlations were found between diets and the skulls, or between diets and residual bite force, after controlling for phylogeny. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that skull morphology was independent of diet, and phylogeny had a greater impact on skull morphology than diet in these species. The changes in skull size and morphology have led to variation in bite force, and finally different bat species feeding on different foods. In conclusion, I. io has a larger skull size, robust mandibles, shortened dentitions, longer coronoid processes, expanded angular processes, low condyles, and taller cranial sagittal crests, and wider zygomatic arches that provide this species with mechanical advantages; their greater bite force may help them use larger and hard-bodied birds as a dietary component.
RESUMEN
Bats vocalize extensively within various social contexts. Nevertheless, studies of agonistic interactions, associating vocalizations signalling the emotional state of a caller with individual signatures during aggressive vocalizations remain scarce. Here, we examined whether male Great Himalayan leaf-nosed bats (Hipposideros armiger) modify their aggressive vocalizations during agonistic interactions depending on the level of aggression, and whether these vocalizations encode individual signatures. We applied a cost-benefit analysis to audio-video recordings of 50 dyadic agonistic interactions to categorize displays into two levels of aggression intensity (low aggression: bared teeth, slightly pulled up body and/or wings; high aggression: rapidly flapping wings, punching, biting). Male H. armiger used graded visual agonistic displays accompanied by bent upward frequency modulation (bUFM) vocalizations to defend their roosting territories. At high aggression intensities, males decreased the minimum frequency of aggressive calls and increased the frequency bandwidth. Males also transferred energy from the second harmonic to the first harmonic as the threat escalated. These systematic modifications of acoustic parameters as aggressive intensity fluctuated corresponded to prosodic modifications in human speech, indicating that emotion-related acoustic cues are a common feature of acoustic communication in mammals. In addition, we found that the aggressive calls of eight adult males encoded discriminable signatures, and that males could discriminate among individuals based on these aggressive calls. Such discrimination is probably useful for individual identification among rival neighbours.