[Management of bone metastasis originating from lung cancer].

The preceding molecular target therapies have prolonged the life expectancy of many lung cancer patients, and some lung cancer patients have become long-term survivors. On the other hand, the proportion of patients who suffer from complications with bone metastasis and skeletal-related events(SRE)is increasing. Through management of bone metastasis, the preservation of quality of life and functional independence can be better maintained. Zoledronic acid and denosumab are usable in clinical practice; However, there are many problems in regard to treatments for bone metastasis. Lung cancer patients should be treated with bone metastasis with the coordinating cooperation between orthopedists, radiotherapists and dental surgeons.

Clinical significance of primary prophylactic pegylated-granulocyte-colony stimulating factor after the administration of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer.

Whether primary prophylactic pegylated-granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) should be administered immediately after the initiation of ramucirumab plus docetaxel (DR) to prevent the occurrence of febrile neutropenia (FN) is unclear. Our retrospective study aimed to elucidate whether PEG-G-CSF could control the occurrence of FN as a result of DR in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. Thirty-three patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer who had received DR were eligible for our analysis. Of the 33 patients, 29 received prophylactic PEG-G-CSF immediately after DR, but none developed FN. However, FN was observed in 2 (50%) of the 4 patients that were not administered PEG-CSF. The overall response and disease control rates in the 29 patients with prophylactic PEG-GSF were 31% and 62%, respectively. The median progression-free and overall survival rates of the patients with and without prophylactic PEG-GSF were 177 and 163 days (P = 0.20), and 628 and 274 days (P = 0.13), respectively. Primary prophylactic PEG-G-CSF suppressed the occurrence of FN secondary to the administration of DR.

Improved efficacy of ramucirumab plus docetaxel after nivolumab failure in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the chemotherapy response improves after exposure to immunotherapy. Antiangiogenic agents have been shown to stimulate the immune system and cause synergistic effects that stimulate tumor shrinkage. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate improvement of the efficacy of ramucirumab plus docetaxel after the failure of nivolumab as a PD-1 inhibitor. METHODS: From February 2016 to December 2017, 152 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) administered nivolumab in our institution were identified. We reviewed the records of 20 NSCLC patients administered ramucirumab plus docetaxel after nivolumab failure. The overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was prophylactically administered to 18 patients (90%) after the administration of ramucirumab plus docetaxel. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 70 (range: 55-77) years. Twelve patients were male and eight were female. The histology was adenocarcinoma in 16 patients, squamous cell carcinoma in three, and other in one. The ORR of ramucirumab plus docetaxel was 60%, and the PFS and OS were 169 and 343 days, respectively. Among the 20 patients, 12 achieved a partial response, giving an ORR of 60.0%. Six patients had stable disease and two had progressive disease. The disease control rate was 90%. Gastrointestinal adverse events were frequently observed in 19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ramucirumab plus docetaxel achieved a higher response rate when administered immediately after nivolumab failure compared to regimens without prior nivolumab administration.

Superiority of respiratory failure risk index in prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications after digestive surgery in Japanese patients.

BACKGROUND: Several multifactorial risk indexes have been proposed by Western countries for identifying patients at a high risk of developing postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). However, there is no consensus on how to evaluate the risk of PPC and what multifactorial risk index should be adapted for Japanese patients. This study aimed at clarifying the utility of risk indexes to predict PPC following digestive surgeries in Japanese patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 892 patients who underwent digestive surgeries under general anesthesia in Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital between January 2009 and March 2011. PPC was defined as postoperative respiratory failure and postoperative pneumonia. We calculated three risk indexes (respiratory failure risk index (RFRI), postoperative pneumonia risk index, and PPC risk score), and compared them between the PPC group and the non-PPC group. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to compare the usefulness of each index. RESULTS: PPC developed in 55 patients (6.2%). All risk indexes were significantly higher in the PPC group than the non-PPC group. The category classification of the risk scores demonstrated a significant tendency to increase the incidence rate of PPC. In the ROC analysis, the area under the curve for RFRI was 0.762 (95% CI 0.697-0.826), which was the highest value observed among these indexes. CONCLUSIONS: Multifactorial risk indexes are useful tools for identifying Japanese patients at a high risk of developing PPC following digestive surgeries. Of the risk indexes evaluated in this study, RFRI is potentially the most accurate in predicting PPC.